Taxacom: What to with "Thalpochares gisella Schaus, 1904" vs. "Hayesia grisella (Schaus, 1904)"

[Markku Savela]

While checking original of "Hayesia grisella (Schaus, 1904), I was 
surprised to find it as

   Thalpochares gisella Schaus, 1904

   https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fstream%2Ftransactionsofam301904amer%23page%2F162%2Fmode%2F1up&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cc4f1e44ed6b6419b2cf908dca2783ea7%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638563885456402075%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GKVBD4Tu0ru9fxmNcnR1EByG9LxvZZw8KMyl4BPET18%3D&reserved=0

But, everyone thereafter seems to be assuming "Thalpochares grisella 
Schaus, 1904". Did I miss a justified emendation somewhere? Or is there 
some other "grisella" and my literature reference is wrong?

   TS of Stictothripa Hampson, 1912

   https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fstream%2Fcatalogueoflepid11brituoft%23page%2F450%2Fmode%2F1up&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cc4f1e44ed6b6419b2cf908dca2783ea7%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638563885456402075%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=58%2BbE4om24pusNWdQp5UL7bSG0n1kB4hgNNq7PYMpqw%3D&reserved=0

   TS of Hayeseia Nye, 1975

   https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.org%2Fstream%2Fgenericnamesofmo1197nyei%23page%2F231%2Fmode%2F1up&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cc4f1e44ed6b6419b2cf908dca2783ea7%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638563885456402075%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3W3GDgWNRzVaZ2XJd%2Ftg6nqzFUMwaj8g889kWDlREjU%3D&reserved=0

Should we use "Hayesia gisella (Schaus, 1904)" or "Hayesia grisella 
(Schaus, 1904)"


-- Markku Savela