Taxacom: "Early Permian" angiosperms... real or not real taxa/names?
Kenneth Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 2 18:52:31 CDT 2022
Hi Tony,
I guess it partially depends on how one defines "angiosperm", but I think it is much broader than "flowering plant". Stem angiosperms (proto-angiosperms, if you will) were likely around in the Triassic, but both their bodies and pollen would have probably been very hard to distinguish from gymnosperms. Even more so if stem-angiosperms were around in the Permian.
Another problem is that the sister group of angiosperms (sensu lato) is also a matter of debate (is the sister group gymnosperms as a whole or some subset of gymnosperms?). In any case, I am rather skeptical that Wachtler's Permian fossils are stem-angiosperms.
-------------------Ken
________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at lists.ku.edu> on behalf of Tony Rees via Taxacom <taxacom at lists.ku.edu>
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 6:12 PM
To: Michael Heads <m.j.heads at gmail.com>
Cc: taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: Taxacom: "Early Permian" angiosperms... real or not real taxa/names?
Hi Michael, yes but unless I am mistaken, these are only hypothetical dates
based on suggestions from molecular evidence. So far as I am aware there
are still no "accepted" pre-Cretaceous angiosperm fossils. Were
Mr/Dr Wachtler's "Early Permian angiosperms" to be authenticated by other
workers the results would be a paleobotanical sensation, which is I suspect
why they have been published outside the mainstream literature, more than
likely without peer review...
I still wonder what it is he is describing, though...
Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2FTonyRees&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n5E44peH3MAgw49zdbJBKH%2FlGwWUzSqpXPigQS5%2FDmw%3D&reserved=0
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 07:10, Michael Heads <m.j.heads at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Dates for angiosperms in recent studies include:
> Triassic to Late Permian (Beaulieu et al., 2015); Triassic-Permian (Zhang
> et al., 2020); Triassic-Carboniferous (Salomo et al., 2017), and Permian
> (Yang et al., 2020).
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 8:09 AM Tony Rees via Taxacom <taxacom at lists.ku.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Taxacomers,
>>
>> As some of you will be aware, with IRMNG (the Interim Register of Marine
>> and Nonmarine Genera) I attempt to compile a synoptic list of published
>> genus names, arranged in a "management classification" (an attempt at
>> synthesis of what seems to be current practise in the literature), for all
>> life i.e. animals, plants and more (including the most obscure
>> microfossils, viruses and prokaryotes).
>>
>> Currently I am attempting to back fill some gaps in recently published
>> fossil plant names and came across this work and some of its associated
>> publications: "The Evolution of the First Flowers Early Permian
>> Angiosperms" by Michael Wachtler, apparently more or less self published
>> by
>> the Dolomythos Museum, Italy, see
>>
>> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fprofile%2FWachtler-Michael%2Fpublication%2F341323347_The_Evolution_of_the_First_Flowers_-_Early_Permian_Angiosperms%2Flinks%2F5ebac7e392851c11a8620fbc%2FThe-Evolution-of-the-First-Flowers-Early-Permian-Angiosperms.pdf&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dbWCa8EYWmwDuzqAG%2Fv1CXZNnKP2DZKhLueYNjaxc8c%3D&reserved=0
>> , in which he establishes a number of new genera and species for what he
>> insists are new Permian angiosperm flowers, a contention carried through
>> to
>> a number of other, similar works.
>>
>> Since otherwise, the earliest accepted angiosperm fossils do not appear
>> until the Cretaceous (refer e.g. Herendeen et al. 2017,
>>
>> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fnplants201715&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=COCqLbVzqYzuiEpRtg%2BYr6EYcY73azF%2FpQjldNkK4P8%3D&reserved=0),
>> one is forced to the
>> conclusion that either Wachtler's fossils are not angiosperms, or not
>> Permian, or perhaps not either, although they do look like flowers from
>> his
>> pictures. Perhaps the dating is wrong - I am no specialist in such
>> matters;
>> but in any case there is at least a 150 million year difference between
>> the
>> start of the Permian and the start of the Cretaceous periods (with all of
>> the Triassic and Jurassic between), so something is badly amiss...
>>
>> Nevertheless, I am wondering whether Wachtler's published names should
>> stand, from a nomenclatural point of view, irrespective of the
>> "challenging" ages ascribed to them, or whether they do not merit
>> inclusion
>> in my system on the basis of possibly invalid publication (which does not
>> seem to be the case) or other considerations. I note of interest, that
>> Wachtler's publications do seem to be cited by no-one but himself, which
>> does raise a bit of a red flag...
>>
>> Your opinions welcome!
>>
>> Thanks in advance - Tony
>>
>> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
>>
>> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2FTonyRees&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=n5E44peH3MAgw49zdbJBKH%2FlGwWUzSqpXPigQS5%2FDmw%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irmng.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ofxA8LhoxThd04P6MMCKeX%2BEKbcoBdnBJuaimyG1EOc%3D&reserved=0
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>>
>> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu
>> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
>> https://lists.ku.edu/listinfo/taxacom
>> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu
>> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
>> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaxacom.markmail.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Lhm35tyRwzEg3HvuUGLd18LEiRIzWSZxxUiR3m607lU%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 35 years, 1987-2022.
>>
>
>
> --
> Dunedin, New Zealand.
>
> My books:
>
> *Biogeography and evolution in New Zealand. *Taylor and Francis/CRC, Boca
> Raton FL. 2017.
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.routledge.com%2FBiogeography-and-Evolution-in-New-Zealand%2FHeads%2Fp%2Fbook%2F9781498751872&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PWyKVQ%2BRsimXIGSXPb7BXsme8hVVofg6PPJcDndSUOY%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> *Biogeography of Australasia: A molecular analysis*. Cambridge
> University Press, Cambridge. 2014. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cambridge.org%2F9781107041028&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EVoaLVzhD57NwL9Uzn0eymQJRPDLEFCLyufO8304PuA%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> *Molecular panbiogeography of the tropics. *University of California
> Press, Berkeley. 2012. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ucpress.edu%2Fbook.php%3Fisbn%3D9780520271968&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vUHOuonZNvA6BM5I5JlBCZQh7Ak2LBMI%2FL7crzs3pwg%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> *Panbiogeography: Tracking the history of life*. Oxford University Press,
> New York. 1999. (With R. Craw and J. Grehan).
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.co.nz%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DBm0_QQ3Z6GUC&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wC2GTsObT%2FVuK%2Fyi0eSFGv81hEwnOh0Ft83td1tbLi8%3D&reserved=0
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.co.nz%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DBm0_QQ3Z6GUC%26dq%3Dpanbiogeography%26source%3Dgbs_navlinks_s&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lF2mXu3PmlIgHEhR9FV1Vc8XQ1vf9489dX0WeZsBIa4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu
For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: https://lists.ku.edu/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu
The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaxacom.markmail.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ca1e05367e7684430cc0408da44f2f685%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637898107927451471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Lhm35tyRwzEg3HvuUGLd18LEiRIzWSZxxUiR3m607lU%3D&reserved=0
Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 35 years, 1987-2022.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list