Taxacom: Subspecies PROBABLY described
Douglas Yanega
dyanega at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 11:36:11 CST 2022
On 2/23/22 8:31 AM, Mikhail Daneliya via Taxacom wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I cannot decide about the status of a mysid crustacean subspecies. Maybe
> you can help.
>
> Bacescu (1981) suggested that Boreomysis inermis from the Peru-Chile Trench
> "probably" belongs to a separate subspecies B.i.peruana. He provided
> characters and illustrations, and mentioned "n.ssp." after the name, but
> did not designate any types.
>
> This "probably" confuses me.
>
> What do you think about the availability here?
This is very similar to a recent publication involving carabid beetles,
with two "proposed" new subspecies names in the text, and a recent
bumblebee paper with a "proposed" new species name in the text. Without
explicit type designations, none of these names are available. That this
seems to be happening so often suggests that there are a lot of editors
and reviewers that are unfamiliar with the Code. At the very least, if a
person intends to SUGGEST that something MIGHT be a taxon but is not
prepared to formally describe it, someone needs to discourage them from
proposing a name for it, and suggest instead to just give it an
arbitrary designation like "subspecies X", or "subspecies 3", that can't
be mistaken for a name.
Peace,
--
Doug Yanega Dept. of Entomology Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314 skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.ucr.edu%2F~heraty%2Fyanega.html&data=04%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cb42c25aca9d0463c96d308d9f6f2fd3d%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637812346524543334%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Pe8A0eZQXu%2BSgt7j53MtPe5ytEIcny5FRqP8%2Ffw4j%2Bc%3D&reserved=0
"There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list