[Taxacom] is different ending for gender a synonym

[Thomas Pape]

A synonym is one of two or more names of the same rank used to denote the same taxonomic taxon.
Lists of synonyms usually include names in their correct original spelling and in their original combination (the basionym in botany).

Epialus hyperboreus Moschler, 1826 and Gazoryctra hyperborea (Moschler, 1826) are not synonyms but different combinations of the same species-group name.
"hyperboreus" and "hyperborea" are different spellings of the same name.

Thomas

Thomas Pape, Natural History Museum of Denmark

-----Original Message-----
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> On Behalf Of Tony Rees via Taxacom
Sent: 3. januar 2020 06:27
To: John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com>
Cc: taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] is different ending for gender a synonym

Hi John,

Technically it is not a synonym (in zoology, that would have to be a different epithet entirely, or perhaps the same one with a different authority and based on a different type) but a variant or incorrect orthography (according to the Code only the one that is in gender agreement would be correct). However you could include it in a synonyms list in my view, with an appropriate note - along with other things that may not technically be synonyms such as nomina nuda, alternative combinations, etc., which often also appear in "synonyms" lists (as other names that have been applied to this taxon) but are not synonyms in the strict sense. Just my 2 cents of course...

Regards - Tony

Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
https://about.me/TonyRees


On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 15:16, John Grehan via Taxacom < taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:

> I'm compiling synonyms for species in a taxonomic list and I am 
> curious to know if there is a standard view of what happens with 
> different gender endings - whether they are considered synonyms that 
> should be listed. For example, Moschler 1826 named Epialus hyperboreus 
> which was later transferred to Gazoryctra as hperborea - presumably to 
> match the gender, but then later the species was listed by the same 
> author along with some others (Nielsen et al 2000) as  Gazoryctra 
> hyperboreus, reflecting their view that species endings should stay with the original.
> I'm not worried about arguments over that choice, but whether these 
> names are formal synonyms. Nielsen et al (2000) did not list 
> hyperborea as a synonym, but I noticed that it was listed as a synonym 
> on a taxonomic website  https://ftp.funet.fi/
>
> So, is there any formal criterion or is it just a matter of personal 
> viewpoint as to whether the different endings constitute synonyms?
>
> Thanks for any input on this.
>
> John Grehan
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu 
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for 32 some years, 1987-2019.
>
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for 32 some years, 1987-2019.