[Taxacom] Iapyx vs. Japyx (etc.) in Diplura

[Stephen Thorpe]

Tony,I think this is an example of a wider printing orthography issue for older works.Stephen    On Sunday, 12 April 2020, 05:30:08 pm UTC, Tony Rees via Taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:  
 
 Dear Taxacomers,

In the Hexapod class (formerly order) Diplura, two forms of the genus name
Iapyx Haliday, 1864 are in current use, namely Iapyx and Japyx, same for
the family names based on this genus (Iapygidae/Japygidae); Japyx can
perhaps be construed either as a lapsus, a subsequent emendation, or a
legitimate correction; the name was originally published as

Haliday, A.H. 1864. *Iapyx,* a new genus of insects belonging to the stirps
Thysanura, in the order Neuroptera.
<https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/publication/e22adc15-efeb-48c9-b0fe-990dabe813a3>
 *Transactions of the Linnean Society of London*
<https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/publication/a6b0ca4d-471d-4666-96a2-8fee5114bc35>
 *24*: 441-447 .

In the absence of an ICZN ruling on the matter, are there any rules or
precedents to decide which spelling is preferable to use, and/or the
technically "correct" one?

Regards - Tony

Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
https://about.me/TonyRees
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years, 1987-2020.