[Taxacom] Autonymy: usage of terms in Botanical Nomenclature

[Mary Barkworth]

From the ICNafp (Art. 23.4) (http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php?page=art23):
The specific epithet, with or without the addition of a transcribed symbol, may not exactly repeat the generic name (a designation formed by such repetition is a tautonym).

I use tautonymic as an adjective when I need an adjective (e.g., the tautonymic subspecies). I have no idea where I picked that form up.   
Mary

-----Original Message-----
From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Christopher Davis
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:01 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] Autonymy: usage of terms in Botanical Nomenclature

Dear Plant Taxonomists,

I would like clarification on the proper adjective(s) to use in describing the Autonym in taxonomical publications. I note that the adjective "nominate" has been preferred to the more general "nominal" when referring to the Nominotypical taxon in Zoology. Should either of these terms be used in botanical publications, and if not, does the adjective "autonymous"
exist and fulfill this role?

Sincerely,

Christopher Davis
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Channeling Intellectual Exuberance for 29 years in 2016.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Channeling Intellectual Exuberance for 29 years in 2016.