[Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one new species

[Adam Cotton]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Thorpe" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
To: "'Stephen Thorpe'" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>; 
<taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>; "'Doug Yanega'" <dyanega at ucr.edu>; 
<deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
Cc: "'engel'" <msengel at ku.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one 
new species
>
> Example under Art. 8.5.3.3: The following are examples of inadmissible 
> errors: An author, in preparing a manuscript for publication, states that 
> days date for the registration date, intending to register it later that 
> day but forgetting to do so. The author discovers the omission after the 
> work is published and immediately registers it; because registration 
> occurred after publication, the work is not available.
>
> Is it just me, or does this make no sense whatsoever? Author "states that 
> days date for the registration date" WHERE??
>
> Stephen
>
>

Clearly this means that the author types that day's date (the one on which 
he added the details) in the manuscript but forgets to register it in 
Zoobank, only realising after publication of the paper.

Adam.