[Taxacom] Revision using taxonomic concept approach

[Stephen Thorpe]

Looking at this sentence from the abstract: 

'Prior to this study, Minyomerus sec. O’Brien & Wibmer (1982) contained seven species, whereas the monotypic Piscatopus sec. O’Brien & Wibmer (1982) was comprised solely of P. griseus Sleeper, 1960 sec. O’Brien & Wibmer (1982)'.

Surely, this is just an overly complicated way of saying: 

'Prior to this study, Minyomerus contained seven species, whereas the monotypic Piscatopus was comprised solely of P. griseus Sleeper, 1960 (O’Brien & Wibmer, 1982)'.

Where the O’Brien & Wibmer, 1982 citation in parenthesis is just a regular citation for the information expressed in the sentence.

Stephen

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 23/10/15, Nico Franz <nico.franz at asu.edu> wrote:

 Subject: [Taxacom] Revision using taxonomic concept approach
 To: "TAXACOM" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
 Received: Friday, 23 October, 2015, 2:54 AM
 
 Dear Taxacomers:
 
    This revision explores of the use of
 taxonomic concept labels to
 integrate past, current, and presumably future inferences
 about this
 particular (so-perceived) group (e.g. Figures 1-4). One
 might think of it
 also as a biodiversity database design sketch.
 
 Jansen MA, Franz NM (2015) Phylogenetic revision of
 Minyomerus Horn, 1876
 sec. Jansen & Franz, 2015 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)
 using taxonomic
 concept annotations and alignments. ZooKeys 528: 1-133.doi:
 10.3897/zookeys.528.6001
 
 Cheers,
 
 Nico
 _______________________________________________
 Taxacom Mailing List
 Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
 
 Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.