[Taxacom] Twitter Fwd: Nature needs names: 60 new dragonflies from Africa

[Scott Thomson]

Hi Richard,

yes anything that can be turned into a url will work, it is just so it
clicks through to the desired record. My point on the family group name was
not nomenclatural, nor for nomenclatural reasons. It was so that people
could read the tweet and identify what taxonomic group was being discussed,
then either ignore it or click it depending on their interests. Species, or
genus works also.

Ok Facebook..... both a nemesis and a useful thing. It requires maintenance
and this would be the biggest downside. Anyone can post to it unless you
exact strong control over this, which you can do so you would have to
carefully set it up. On the upside, they can, used well, be good
advertising for Zoobank and the ICZN, will get those names out there far
better than a website will these days. It puts the ICZN and Zoobank in the
face of the people. Which I believe could be good for the ICZN. I just saw
your message below to Rod while typing this, yes twitter is not as popular
as it used to be. The text restriction being a big issue, and this is one
of the reasons Facebook has become so popular.

On Google + very specific version of Facebook, some think more
professional, sorry but its same old same old, just not done as well with a
lack of cross browser support. However still worth doing. For my blog
whenever I add new articles it automatically sends messages to twitter,
facebook, google + I get more hits from Facebook than anywhere else. I get
2500 unique visitors a year, over half from Facebook.

Cheers, Scott

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
wrote:

> OK, thanks for the elaboration.  The LSIDs are long and cumbersome; I
> prefer the 36-character UUIDs; especially when formulating an HTTP URL.  It
> would be redundant to have both the link and the LSID/UUID; so we could
> include the taxon name and/or citation of the reference and/or author name
> (depending on what the registration is).
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, a family can only be included for family-group names.  The
> link between a genus- or species-group name and a family is a matter of
> taxonomy, not nomenclature; and ZooBank is (sort of) limited to
> nomenclature.  However, this could be a perfect collaboration with Catalog
> of Life, where ZooBank pipes new names to COL as they come in, and likewise
> can perform a service to link genus/species names to a higher
> classification (including family).
>
>
>
> Maybe there should also be a ZooBank Facebook page? What other social
> media pipelines would be appropriate (does anyone actually use Google+ ?)
>
>
>
> Someday…. If only there were unlimited funding and unlimited hours in the
> day…
>
>
>
> Aloha,
>
> Rich
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Thomson [mailto:scott.thomson321 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 1:32 AM
> *To:* Richard Pyle
> *Cc:* Stephen Thorpe; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu; gread at actrix.gen.nz
> *Subject:* Re: [Taxacom] Twitter Fwd: Nature needs names: 60 new
> dragonflies from Africa
>
>
>
> To keep it non political, and simple, tweet the LSID's as a daily new
> papers. along with the Family name to make it obvious what group is
> discussed. People can click the link for details. No need to use all the
> characters, just keep it simple.
>
>
>
> Was not saying this should be done by the way, just an option based on
> what Doug was saying. Not everyone uses RSS, likewise not everyone uses
> Twitter. However tweeting the LSID's may encourage journals to register
> with Zoobank better as it will be effective advertising for them.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Doug's other point of some twitter feed or something listing papers,
> > effectively, could not Zoobank effectively do that under a twitter
> account
> > #Zoobank that does a daily "whats new":
>
> ZooBank already has an RSS feed; would a separate Twitter feed be useful?
> How best to use the 140 characters?  A core ZooBank URL is minimally 55
> characters ("http://zoobank.org/" + 36 characters for the UUID -- though
> we could strip the dashes and make it 51 characters total).  How best to
> use the remaining characters?
>
> Please bear in mind that I only vaguely understand what Twitter is.... (I
> develop sophisticated databases, and cutting-edge diving technology; but
> I'm a total luddite when it comes to social media).
>
> Aloha,
> Rich
>
> Richard L. Pyle, PhD
> Database Coordinator for Natural Sciences | Associate Zoologist in
> Ichthyology | Dive Safety Officer
> Department of Natural Sciences, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu,
> HI 96817
> Ph: (808)848-4115, Fax: (808)847-8252 email: deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
> http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/staff/pylerichard.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Scott Thomson
>
> Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo
>
> Divisão de Vertebrados (Herpetologia)
>
> Avenida Nazaré, 481, Ipiranga
>
> 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
>
> http://www.carettochelys.com
>
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-2722
>
> Lattes: *http://lattes.cnpq.br/0323517916624728*
> <https://wwws.cnpq.br/cvlattesweb/PKG_MENU.menu?f_cod=1E409F4BF37BFC4AD13FD58CDB7AA5FD>
>
> Skype: Faendalimas
>
> Mobile Phone: +55 11 974 74 9095
>
>
>



-- 
Scott Thomson
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo
Divisão de Vertebrados (Herpetologia)
Avenida Nazaré, 481, Ipiranga
04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
http://www.carettochelys.com
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-2722
Lattes: *http://lattes.cnpq.br/0323517916624728*
<https://wwws.cnpq.br/cvlattesweb/PKG_MENU.menu?f_cod=1E409F4BF37BFC4AD13FD58CDB7AA5FD#>
Skype: Faendalimas
Mobile Phone: +55 11 974 74 9095