[Taxacom] Open Access taxonomy

Wed May 25 22:55:49 CDT 2011

One important aspect of Open Access publishing, not yet touched in this
tread, is the possibility of unlimited dissemination starting right on the
day of publication. The academic world is only one of the consumers - very
important of course - of that information. Recently ZooKeys and PhytoKeys
launched a small press office and invite the authors to offer press releases
on their published results. We edit and distribute the press releases
through massmedia networks. I must confess that the effect is spectacular!
Personally, I never expected that finding of "mysterious purse-web spiders
in South Africa", for example, will enjoy more than a thousand of hits from
massmedia, blogs, science journalists, etc, just within few days after
posting. A large portion of readers come to see also the original
publication.

Can one even compare the effect of this kind of dissemination with the
distribution of "paid-for" articles or their PDFs "among colleagues"?

Taxonomy  does matter for the society! People are interested to see this
kind of news and understand how important biodiversity science is. We all
need however to put large effort in outreach activities. This is the way to
change the landscape for a brighter future of taxonomy.

Lyubomir

.

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Bryan <pbryan.heidorn at gmail.com> wrote:

> All true! We need to educate tenure and promotion committees of these
> problems as well.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:43 PM,  <Frank.Krell at dmns.org> wrote:
> > "It seems that
> > scientists do not take personal responsibility for calculating the
> > costs of their publishing decisions while sitting behind their
> > computer monitors."
> >
> > With increasing job-insecurity, short-term contracts, tenured positions
> fading away, and, on the other hand, increasing reliance of administrators
> and auditors on metrics (Journal Impact Factor) or at least on where
> something is published (the "leading" journals) it is clear how publishing
> decisions are made: Go to the 'best' possible journals, i.e. the ones with
> the highest impact factor or the highest prestige. The majority of such
> journals are published by commercial publishers.
> >
> > Not many scientists have the luxury to think about availability of their
> work, or the financial situation of libraries, or any other rational or
> philanthropic questions. They have to think about their next review.
> > Even if they enjoy the luxury of a permanent or tenured position, it
> seems to be the norm to go with the flow: It is expected to publish in
> prestigious, established journals. Oneself is proud to have a paper in
> Nature or Systematic Entomology, more so than in an innovative journal like
> ZooKeys. A lot has to change in the sociology of academia to get out of this
> vicious circle.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > Dr Frank T. Krell
> > Curator of Entomology
> > Commissioner, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
> > Chair, ICZN ZooBank Committee
> > Department of Zoology
> > Denver Museum of Nature & Science
> > 2001 Colorado Boulevard
> > Denver, CO 80205-5798 USA
> > Frank.Krell at dmns.org
> > Phone: (+1) (303) 370-8244
> > Fax: (+1) (303) 331-6492
> > http://www.dmns.org/science/museum-scientists/frank-krell
> > lab page: http://www.dmns.org/krell-lab
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:
> taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Bryan
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 12:15 PM
> > To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Open Access taxonomy
> >
> > I agree with everyone's point of view in this thread to different
> > degrees but I need to point out the perspective of the library.
> > Subscription costs have far outpaced inflation for decades. Ah for the
> > good old days when library subscriptions were affordable. Since
> > information consumers are inoculated from the costs of the journals
> > they are inelastic and can rise disproportionately to value.
> > Researchers expect to be able to just go to the library and the
> > journals will be there "for free" and librarians have not been able to
> > control subscription costs.
> >
> > I do not intend to single out Elsevier but this was the first open
> > access reference I found and I do not mind singling out Elsevier since
> > they are so large. The following scenario repeats across the
> > publishing industry for all libraries.
> >
> > "The first round of big deal contracts with Elsevier were signed
> > shortly before the turn of the millennium. As these contracts expired,
> > the big deals were not as compelling a bargain as they had been when
> > first signed. The 7% compounded annual increase built into these
> > five-year contracts meant a 40% increase in the subscription price
> > over the life of the contract. Over the same period, from 1999-2004,
> > the US consumer price index rose by only 13%."
> > Theodore Bergstrom, Librarians and the terrible fix: economics of the
> > big deal. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community. Volume 23,
> > Number 2 / July 2010. Pages: 77 - 82.
> >
> http://uksg.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&issn=0953-0460&volume=23&issue=2&spage=77
> >
> > The subscription model is not broken or the publishers. I became
> > depressed for several days a couple of years ago when I met a
> > publisher in a state park in his 80ft air conditioned RV with foldaway
> > bar and nice scotch.. or so it seemed 80ft from my tent. The owner was
> > retired at age 50 after spending 15 years in publishing scientific
> > journals. He did share his scotch. The subscription model is not
> > obviously broken for researchers because they can "just" go to the
> > library and get the materials for free. We need publishing
> > alternatives if for no other reason than to put downward price
> > pressure on the publishers but that will only work if scientists
> > choose to publish is the more cost effective journals. It seems that
> > scientists do not take personal responsibility for calculating the
> > costs of their publishing decisions while sitting behind their
> > computer monitors.
> >
> > Bryan Heidorn
> > Director, School of Information Resources and Library Science
> > University of Arizona
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:56 AM,  <Frank.Krell at dmns.org> wrote:
> >> Well, isn't that the reason why we have a library system? Not each new
> reader has to pay to read. Yes, you need a library pass, and access to a
> library which has access to the literature you need. However, even when I
> was a school kid, I managed to get almost all the literature I needed
> (scientific papers, I mean), with very little investment (train tickets to
> the next library, interlibrary loan fees).
> >>
> >> Yes, it is much more efficient to stay glued in front of a computer
> screen and have everything readily on hand.
> >>
> >> And from the publisher's standpoint: The subscription model still works.
> For example, if I want to eat a pizza, I pay for it and get it. Oh well,
> this is just the 99.999% of the world outside scientific publishing...
> >>
> >> Frank
> >>
> >>
> >> Dr Frank T. Krell
> >> Curator of Entomology
> >> Commissioner, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
> >> Chair, ICZN ZooBank Committee
> >> Department of Zoology
> >> Denver Museum of Nature & Science
> >> 2001 Colorado Boulevard
> >> Denver, CO 80205-5798 USA
> >> Frank.Krell at dmns.org
> >> Phone: (+1) (303) 370-8244
> >> Fax: (+1) (303) 331-6492
> >> http://www.dmns.org/science/museum-scientists/frank-krell
> >> lab page: http://www.dmns.org/krell-lab
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:
> taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Roderic Page
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:39 AM
> >> To: Taxacom
> >> Cc: John Noyes
> >> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Open Access taxonomy
> >>
> >> Dear John,
> >>
> >> Sure, there's no such thing as a free lunch. But there's an asymmetry
> between a one-time cost to publish, versus requiring each  new reader having
> to pay to read. And that's even without considering the potential for reuse
> that comes with (most) Open Access articles.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Rod
> >>
> >> On 25 May 2011, at 17:17, John Noyes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well, I suppose it lies behind an "input" paywall (pay to publish) or
> >>> output paywall (pay to access) or both. You take your pick. Very few
> >>> "open access" publications are open and free on either or both sides of
> >>> the publishing spectrum. That includes Zookeys, Zootaxa, and Plos One.
> >>> Someone has to pay somewhere.
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>> John Noyes
> >>> Scientific Associate
> >>> Department of Entomology
> >>> Natural History Museum
> >>> Cromwell Road
> >>> South Kensington
> >>> London SW7 5BD
> >>> UK
> >>> jsn at nhm.ac.uk
> >>> Tel.: +44 (0) 207 942 5594
> >>> Fax.: +44 (0) 207 942 5229
> >>>
> >>> Universal Chalcidoidea Database (everything you wanted to know about
> >>> chalcidoids and more):
> >>> www.nhm.ac.uk/chalcidoids
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> >>> [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Roderic Page
> >>> Sent: 25 May 2011 16:27
> >>> To: Taxacom
> >>> Subject: [Taxacom] Open Access taxonomy
> >>>
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>> At the risk of channelling Donat Agosti, I find it somewhat depressing
> >>> that only two of the International Institute for Species Exploration's
> >>> Top 10 new species for 2010 (http://species.asu.edu/Top10 ) were
> >>> published as Open Access articles (see
> >>>
> http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2011/05/top-ten-new-species-described-in-2010
> >>> .html or http://tinyurl.com/3j69cw5 ).
> >>>
> >>> Choice of where to publish is obviously influenced by several,
> sometimes
> >>> conflicting criteria, but it's a pity that so much of taxonomy's output
> >>> lies behind paywalls.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Rod
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Roderic Page
> >>> Professor of Taxonomy
> >>> Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
> >>> College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences
> >>> Graham Kerr Building
> >>> University of Glasgow
> >>> Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
> >>>
> >>> Email: r.page at bio.gla.ac.uk
> >>> Tel: +44 141 330 4778
> >>> Fax: +44 141 330 2792
> >>> AIM: rodpage1962 at aim.com
> >>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1112517192
> >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdmpage
> >>> Blog: http://iphylo.blogspot.com
> >>> Home page: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> Taxacom Mailing List
> >>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> >>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >>>
> >>> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> >>> these methods:
> >>>
> >>> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >>>
> >>> (2) a Google search specified as:
> >>> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >> Roderic Page
> >> Professor of Taxonomy
> >> Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
> >> College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences
> >> Graham Kerr Building
> >> University of Glasgow
> >> Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
> >>
> >> Email: r.page at bio.gla.ac.uk
> >> Tel: +44 141 330 4778
> >> Fax: +44 141 330 2792
> >> AIM: rodpage1962 at aim.com
> >> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1112517192
> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdmpage
> >> Blog: http://iphylo.blogspot.com
> >> Home page: http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >> Taxacom Mailing List
> >> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> >> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >>
> >> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
> >>
> >> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >>
> >> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >> Taxacom Mailing List
> >> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> >> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >>
> >> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
> >>
> >> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >>
> >> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bryan Heidorn
> > University of Arizona
> > http://www.sirls.arizona.edu/heidorn
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >
> > The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
> >
> > (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > (2) a Google search specified as:  site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bryan Heidorn
> University of Arizona
> http://www.sirls.arizona.edu/heidorn
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
> methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:
> mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>

-- 
Dr Lyubomir Penev
Managing Director
Pensoft Publishers
13a Geo Milev Street
1111 Sofia, Bulgaria
Fax +359-2-8704282
www.pensoft.net
info at pensoft.net