[Taxacom] OSHA requirements

[Don.Colless at csiro.au]

The OSHA requirements are simply a symptom of managerialism gone mad. Someone came through my lab a while back, and labelled my 70% alcohol bottle with that same stupid instruction! They also stole my bottle of xylene. No doubt these things are dangerous for laboratory rats.
 
Donald H. Colless
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
GPO Box 1700
Canberra 2601
don.colless at csiro.au
tuz li munz est miens envirun
________________________________________
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Grehan [jgrehan at sciencebuff.org]
Sent: 18 February 2011 02:49
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] OSHA requirements

I have a question directed to those on this list who are involved in dissection work with invertebrates where one may be working with specimens stored in alcohol or being macerated in KOH (5%) and work in a facility that follows OSHA regulations in the US. Our institution is moving to being compliant with OSHA and so I am checking on the requirement for working with the above chemicals when dissecting bugs (moths in my case). I have been informed that when working with any chemicals that OSHA requires handing procedures to follow the specifications on the MSDS sheets for each chemical.



According to the MSDS sheets for 70% ethyl alcohol I should be wearing appropriate protective eyeglasses or chemical safety goggles as described by OSHA's eye and face

protection regulations in 29 CFR 1910.133 or European Standard EN166, wearing protective gloves to prevent skin exposure, and appropriate protective clothing to prevent skin exposure. For 70% isopropyl alcohol the requirements are Safety glasses, lab coat, dust respirator and gloves loves (impervious).



The requirements for KOH appear to be similar.



I am new to all of this so please excuse my naiveté. In all my years I have never seen any entomologist working with dissections, even in federal institutions, wear protective gloves (not sure how that will work with handing forceps, micro scissors etc), eyeglasses, protective clothing etc. This being the case it would appear that the regulations are being ignored (which I would presume to be unlikely) or there is some kind of caveat about the use of these and similar chemicals when working with small amounts in this context. I would be very grateful if someone working in an OSHA compliant institution can explain how it is possible for researchers to dissect and examine preserved material without having to go to the lengths indicated on the MSDS sheets.



Thanks in advance,



John Grehan



Dr. John R. Grehan
Director of Science and Research
Buffalo Museum of Science
1020 Humboldt Parkway
Buffalo, NY 14211-1193

email: jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
Phone: (716) 896-5200 ext 372
Fax: (716) 897-6723

Panbiogeography
http://www.sciencebuff.org/biogeography_and_evolutionary_biology.php

Ghost moth research
http://www.sciencebuff.org/systematics_and_evolution_of_hepialdiae.php

Human evolution and the great apes
http://www.sciencebuff.org/human_origin_and_the_great_apes.php



_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here