[Taxacom] evolution education

[Michael A. Ivie]

Ah, common, facts don't matter, it is amusing to make fun of the square
flat states.  Some people read "What's the Matter with Kansas" (Thomas
Frank, 2004) just so they can be seen with the title.

Just relax, smile, click you heals, and head to Oz.

Mike

> When the Kansas law was passed several years ago there was no perceptible
> effect.  I say that for several reasons.
>
> 1) The law did NOT outlaw the teaching of evolution, as was widely
> reported.  It mandated that the standardized test administered to Kansas
> students would not include evolution.
>
> 2) Many teachers do not get to the chapter of evolution in their textbook
> anyway.  For one thing, it is usually the final chapter in the book.  For
> another thing, in many small towns (not just in Kansas), teaching
> evolution may be inviting trouble.  Even though we think, to quote
> Dobzhansky, nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution,
> many "facts" of biology can be taught outside that context -- so it was
> done.  And a final reason teachers skipped (and still skip) that last
> chapter and do not put everything in an evolutionary context is that they
> themselves are uncertain about the principles of evolution (as I like to
> say, it's not rocket science -- it's harder!!; evolution is a difficult
> concept to understand at a level that allows one to teach it effectively),
> having had a deficient scientific education, which they blithely pass on.
> It is certainly possible to love nature and deny evolution.
>
> 3) The law was reversed before it could be implemented.  At the next
> election, the populace of Kansas voted out of office some of the members
> of the board of education who had enacted that law, and the new majority
> put it back the way it had been.  But the next election,
> scientifically-minded folk, thinking they had won, lost interest in the
> next election, and other evolution-deniers were elected so they had a
> majority again, and the same thing happened all over.  Focus was not lost
> in subsequent elections so we have not had a third cycle (although Kansas
> still gets a bad rap, despite far worse laws being passed in other
> states), and now boards of education seems to have shifted to other
> causes.
>
> So I am not sure that even the premise "as they once did" is justified.
>
>
> Daphne G. Fautin
> Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
> Curator, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center
> Haworth Hall
> University of Kansas
> 1200 Sunnyside Avenue
> Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7534  USA
>
> telephone 1-785-864-3062
> fax 1-785-864-5321
> evo user name fautin
> website www.nhm.ku.edu/~inverts
>
>        direct to database of hexacorals, including sea anemones
>                newest version released 22 December 2010
>          ***http://hercules.kgs.ku.edu/Hexacoral/Anemone2***
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Kenneth Kinman wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>      Another conservative state legislature is facing renewed
>> proposals to challenge evolution in classrooms (which would require
>> teachers to do so whether they like it or not). But in the present day,
>> do such state laws (if passed) actually have a significant impact on the
>> biological education of the vast majority of high school students?
>>       I suspect that those students most likely to be
>> seriously torn between evolution-only scenarios and God-only scenarios,
>> increasingly opt for something in between (God created species,
>> including humans, but through an evolutionary mechanism). An
>> understandable stance for those torn between their parents' God-only
>> scenarios and the scientific evidence for evolution.
>>         So the question is, would a few such state laws (which would
>> presumably be eventually overturned anyway) have any significant
>> long-term effect in the teaching of evolution?  But even if not, would
>> it still (in the short term) be an unfair burden on biology teachers in
>> those states who might be subject to law-suits if their presentation of
>> evolution was not critical enough and angered some conservative parents
>> of those students?   Not that such proposed laws should not be resisted
>> in those states, but do such laws (if they are passed) cause as many
>> problems and harm as they once did?
>>         ---------Ken Kinman
>>
>> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/oklahoma-bill-would-mandate-educators-question-evolution-in-classes/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>>
>> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
>> these methods:
>>
>> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>
>> Or (2) a Google search specified as:
>> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>>_______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here


-- 
Michael A. Ivie, Ph.D., F.R.E.S.
Montana Entomology Collection
Marsh Labs, Room 50
1901 S. 19th Ave
Montana State University
Bozeman, MT 59717-3020
USA

(406) 994-4610 (voice)
(406) 994-6029 (FAX)
mivie at montana.edu