[Taxacom] evolution education
fautin at ku.edu
fautin at ku.edu
Wed Feb 2 20:43:14 CST 2011
When the Kansas law was passed several years ago there was no perceptible
effect. I say that for several reasons.
1) The law did NOT outlaw the teaching of evolution, as was widely
reported. It mandated that the standardized test administered to Kansas
students would not include evolution.
2) Many teachers do not get to the chapter of evolution in their textbook
anyway. For one thing, it is usually the final chapter in the book. For
another thing, in many small towns (not just in Kansas), teaching
evolution may be inviting trouble. Even though we think, to quote
Dobzhansky, nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution,
many "facts" of biology can be taught outside that context -- so it was
done. And a final reason teachers skipped (and still skip) that last
chapter and do not put everything in an evolutionary context is that they
themselves are uncertain about the principles of evolution (as I like to
say, it's not rocket science -- it's harder!!; evolution is a difficult
concept to understand at a level that allows one to teach it effectively),
having had a deficient scientific education, which they blithely pass on.
It is certainly possible to love nature and deny evolution.
3) The law was reversed before it could be implemented. At the next
election, the populace of Kansas voted out of office some of the members
of the board of education who had enacted that law, and the new majority
put it back the way it had been. But the next election,
scientifically-minded folk, thinking they had won, lost interest in the
next election, and other evolution-deniers were elected so they had a
majority again, and the same thing happened all over. Focus was not lost
in subsequent elections so we have not had a third cycle (although Kansas
still gets a bad rap, despite far worse laws being passed in other
states), and now boards of education seems to have shifted to other
causes.
So I am not sure that even the premise "as they once did" is justified.
Daphne G. Fautin
Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Curator, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center
Haworth Hall
University of Kansas
1200 Sunnyside Avenue
Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7534 USA
telephone 1-785-864-3062
fax 1-785-864-5321
evo user name fautin
website www.nhm.ku.edu/~inverts
direct to database of hexacorals, including sea anemones
newest version released 22 December 2010
***http://hercules.kgs.ku.edu/Hexacoral/Anemone2***
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Kenneth Kinman wrote:
> Hi All,
> Another conservative state legislature is facing renewed
> proposals to challenge evolution in classrooms (which would require
> teachers to do so whether they like it or not). But in the present day,
> do such state laws (if passed) actually have a significant impact on the
> biological education of the vast majority of high school students?
> I suspect that those students most likely to be
> seriously torn between evolution-only scenarios and God-only scenarios,
> increasingly opt for something in between (God created species,
> including humans, but through an evolutionary mechanism). An
> understandable stance for those torn between their parents' God-only
> scenarios and the scientific evidence for evolution.
> So the question is, would a few such state laws (which would
> presumably be eventually overturned anyway) have any significant
> long-term effect in the teaching of evolution? But even if not, would
> it still (in the short term) be an unfair burden on biology teachers in
> those states who might be subject to law-suits if their presentation of
> evolution was not critical enough and angered some conservative parents
> of those students? Not that such proposed laws should not be resisted
> in those states, but do such laws (if they are passed) cause as many
> problems and harm as they once did?
> ---------Ken Kinman
>
> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/oklahoma-bill-would-mandate-educators-question-evolution-in-classes/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list