[Taxacom] "Classification of Life" in Wikispecies
Kenneth Kinman
kennethkinman at webtv.net
Sun Dec 12 22:27:51 CST 2010
Dear All,
Tonight I decided to look at the broad classification of Life (on
Earth) presented at Wikispecies. It is frankly a fairly nice compromise
(given all the more split classifications of life now out there):
Superregnum Archaea
Superregnum Bacteria
Superregnum Eukaryota
Regnum Protista
Regnum Fungi
Regnum Plantae
Regnum Ani]malia
Virus (classification still unclear)
I very much like their division of Superregnum Eukaryota. The
basal Regnum Protista is clearly paraphyletic with respect to the other
three. Animalia is equivalent to my Metazoa, so I certainly won't
quibble with which name they happen to choose. Plantae is a little
broader than Metaphyta, but it is still more restricted than
Cavalier-Smith's Plantae (which includes red algae etc.), so I won't
quibble with that compromise.
However, since the Wikispecies classification obviously allows
paraphyly (such as Protista), it would be a FAR more useful
classification if they recognized one paraphyletic Superregnum
Prokaryota (instead of separate Superregna Archaea, Bacteria, and
Virus). Then they would have just Superregnum Prokaryota and
Superregnum Eukaryota (equivalent to Ernst Mayr's two Empires with the
same names). All they have to do is trust Ernst Mayr more than they
trust Carl Woese. As Mayr argued in his debate with Woese, the
prokaryote to eukaryote transition was clearly the most fundamental jump
(gap) in the evolution of life. Otherwise, we wouldn't be here to
debate the subject.
----Ken Kinman, cladistically a member of:
Family Hominidae
paraphyletic Family Pongidae% (great apes)
Order Primates
Class Mammalia
Phylum Chordata
Kingdom Metazoa (= Animalia)
paraphyletic Kingdom Protista%
Regnum/Empire Eukaryota
paraphyletic Regnum/Empire Prokaryota%
P.S. Look at the above. I classify myself with only three major (and
very useful) paraphylies since the origin of life. The first
(prokaryote to eukaryote) transition is clearly the most fundamental.
The second (protist to metazoan) is less fundamental (but still
extremely important due to multicellularity and other developments).
The third is least important, since it was perhaps only fortuitous that
bipedality, increased brain size, and sophisticated tool use led to us
humans. NOTE: frankly I sometimes wonder if I (and the world in
general) would have been better off if dolphins had become bipedal
tool-users instead of apes. QUESTION: would there then have been
examples like Adolph Hitler, Saddam Hussein, or Bernie Madoff among
highly-evolved dolphins???
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list