[Taxacom] Phylogenetic Classification?

[Stephen Thorpe]

> I haven't searched thoroughly, but it's not immediately evident that
> the journal exists in official paper copy.  The names may therefore not
> be legal.
I hate to mention it (no, actually, I love it!), but the answer to  
this is "in your face" if you visit my Wikispecies page on Cryptocercus:

http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cryptocercus

look at the first two listed references...

Stephen

Quoting "Dr. David Campbell" <amblema at bama.ua.edu>:

> 4-1  Three New Species of the Wood Roach, Cryptocercus (Blattodea:
> Cryptocercidae), From the Eastern United States.
> Craig A. Burnside, Paul T. Smith and Srini Kambhampati
> On-line date: February 25, 1999
> Erratum added February 4, 2000
> http://epress.com/w3jbio/vol4/burnside/index.html
> The World Wide Web Journal of Biology
>
> Slight morphological differences were noted, and chromosome number
> varies somewhat, so it's not quite exclusively sequence based.
> I haven't searched thoroughly, but it's not immediately evident that
> the journal exists in official paper copy.  The names may therefore not
> be legal.
>
> --
> Dr. David Campbell
> 425 Scientific Collections Building
> Department of Biological Sciences
> Biodiversity and Systematics
> University of Alabama, Box 870345
> Tuscaloosa AL 35487-0345  USA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either  
> of these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:   
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.