any official terminology?

[Vazrick Nazari]

oops - the link is corrected below:

Vazrick Nazari <nvazrick at YAHOO.COM> wrote:I believe the appropriate terminology to be used is "stat. rev." after the newly proposed combination, no matter if it is a return-to-original, or else.
Here is an example:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/aen/2005/00000044/00000001/art00003

Hope that helps.


Vazrick Nazari
Systematic and evolution
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alberta
Edmonton AB T6G 2E9 Canada


"Edwards, G.B." wrote:
As a point of curiosity, is there any official terminology to restore a
species to its original combination? I don't recall ever encountering
such, not that it's really needed. A New Combination or New Status
designation doesn't seem appropriate (actually, it's an Old Combination/
Old Status), although I suppose you could argue for the latter. It's
just not a very good alternative.

--
G. B. Edwards, Ph.D. [Your Friendly Neighborhood Spiderman]
--
Curator: Arachnida (except Acari), Myriapoda, Terrestrial Crustacea,
Thysanoptera
Florida State Collection of Arthropods, FDACS, Division of Plant
Industry
P.O.Box 147100, 1911 SW 34th St., Gainesville, FL 32614-7100 USA
(352) 372-3505 x194; fax (352) 334-0737; edwardg at doacs.state.fl.us
http://www.fsca.entomology.museum/Arachnida/ArachnidaFrame.htm

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com