genetic vs morphological trace of phylogeny

[HJJACOBSON at AOL.COM]

In a message dated 4/13/2004 4:12:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
pierre.deleporte at UNIV-RENNES1.FR writes:

> >Since DNA is cladistic,
>
> more precisely: can be analysed cladistically (and phenetically, and any
> way you like). For "cladistic" never qualified characters (contra John
> Grehan's obstinate statements).
>

Correct! That is what I meant. Thanks for putting the correct words in my
mouth.

Herb