[ARETE] O'Mahony, Sport Photography

[Duncan Jamieson]

All,
Please find below and attached Jack Ryan's review of Mike O'Mahony'a *Sport
Photography.*

O’Mahony, Mike. *Photography and Sport. *London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 197
pp.



Reviewed by Jack Ryan

Writing in the academic journal, *Historical Social Research*, Mike
O’Mahony, Professor of History of Art and Visual Culture at the University
of Bristol, observes, “Sport, as a cultural manifestation, might be
regarded as primarily a visual experience…. Yet, whilst the material legacy
of sport’s visual culture provides an extensive and highly valuable
resource for research, this has to date been largely untapped” (28).
O’Mahony’s new book, *Photography and Sport*, an *Exposures* monograph
published by Reaktion Books, taps that resource. *Exposures* has published
twenty-two editions to date that explore photography from thematic
perspectives. O’Mahony makes a strong case for sport as a visual
experience, from the beginning of photography to the digital age.

     O'Mahony recognizes 1839 as "a propitious one for sport" (7). In the
United Kingdom, horseracing, boating, rugby, and the discovery of rubber,
which would contribute to the global growth of baseball, basketball, golf,
and tennis, combined to usher in decades of sports evolution at all levels:
recreational, amateur, collegiate, and professional. It was also the year
that artist and physicist Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre “announced a new
image-making process, which he called the daguerreotype” (8). O’Mahony sees
this invention as almost more important than the early growth of sports.
Together, though, sport as a significant social activity and photography as
art have been twinned ever since, which O’Mahony celebrates and chronicles
in this fascinating book. O’Mahony complicates the traditional approach to
photograph study—observing and understanding the work of a photographer or
a school of photography—by focusing on sports in all forms and how sports
reveal the development of photography. He uses theoretical approaches in
this pursuit, including academic thinkers like E.P. Thompson, Richard
Hoggart, and Raymond Williams, because they transformed attitudes toward
sport as “an integral element within culture and thus a subject worthy of
serious study” (9). O’Mahony’s own thesis is straightforward: his book
explores the broad relationship between sport and photography, and it
recognizes “the centrality of sport as a form of global culture within the
modern world” (11). He also grants that mediated visual representations
help to challenge and refine the definition of sports.

    Beyond his foundational introduction, O’Mahony presents seven chapters,
each packed with worthwhile information, solid analysis, and important
suggestions for further study. He moves from early images of Scottish
athletes into motion and movement, the illustrated press, commodification,
masculinity, fans and cultural space, and concludes with the ubiquity of
modern sport. This outline suggests a historical spine; however, O’Mahony’s
lively academic style and his insightful deconstructions of a wide variety
of images turn this book into a cultural study, rather than a historical
analysis that offers period specific appraisal of sports photography.

He opens with Scottish sport and photography due to the fact that since the
birth of photography up to the early 1880s “it was thus predominately
Scottish photographers who played the major role in the representation of
sport” (36). While the chapter primarily centers on the staged images of
tennis players and golfers, O’Mahony expands the chapter by suggesting how
early work still influences contemporary art, such as Rigo 23’s monument to
Tommie Smith and John Carlos on the campus of San José State University and
Peter Hodgkinson’s *The Splash*, found at Preston North End FC’s grounds.
Every chapter of this wonderfully illustrated text contains surprises like
these. O’Mahony’s voice is not pedantic and his logical, analytic approach
seems flawless. Chapter Four, “Sport Sells,” is particularly compelling.
O’Mahony opens his examination with two images of Frank Gifford, one a
monochrome action photograph of Gifford from 1957 as a New York football
Giant, and the other an image from 1962 showing a reflexed Gifford with a
book on his knee and a cigarette in his right hand. Bridging these two
images is a pack of Lucky Strike cigarettes and a headline declaring, “Get
Lucky: the taste to start with…the taste to stay with.” As O’Mahony writes,
“To modern sensibilities, this image of a popular sporting celebrity not
only smoking, but explicitly promoting the practice, perhaps seems jarring”
(91). Briefly, he coverers the early stages of famous sportsmen and
advertisements both in the United States and the United Kingdom in order to
place a “spotlight on the intrinsic relationship between sport as a social
practice and its wider exploitation within the field of commerce and
advertising” (92). One of the most intriguing aspects of this chapter is
the line that O’Mahony draws between Greek conceptions of the athlete and
our contemporary modes of visual representation of athletes.  With a sharp
critical cultural eye, O’Mahony concludes the chapter by inviting others to
explore the implications of these mostly male images: “That sportsmen
should so explicitly be deployed to this end perhaps also reflects a
greater concern that still needs to be addressed, namely the anxieties
concerning the continuing presence of homophobic attitudes that inhabit the
wider culture of sport” (108).

    Ben Shahan’s famous photograph of two men peering through cracks in a
wooden fence, which is simply captioned *Untitled*, provides no clues as to
what is happening. Intuitively, it seems as if these depression-era men
cannot pay to see whatever it is beyond the plank fence. Other photographs
made at the same time are more helpful, including an image titled *Watching
a Football Game, Star City, West Virginia*, which O’Mahony provides, for it
contains all the information needed to understand what these men are doing.
As O’Mahony asserts, “Shahan’s photograph can thus be conceived as
operating within a genre that had come into being virtually as soon as
cameras were first brought to sporting events; namely the imaging of the
sports spectator” (133). O’Mahony frames his discussion of “fan culture and
the spaces of sport” by deploying Émile Durkheim’s theory of “collective
effervescence,” originally used to define religious practices. He
complicates things by inviting Benedict Anderson's theory of an idealized
"imagined community" into his analysis. For example, in the United States,
since the 1920s, sports spectatorship marked a new behavior that attempted
to knit the nation together into a mass society, which never worked at a
universal level for a variety of reasons. Of course, these idealized
theories reach a low point in the period covering the mid-1960s to the late
1980s in Britain with the growth of football hooliganism. O’Mahony
skillfully debunks some of the claims made about a notorious image taken
after Scotland defeated England in 1977 at Wembley Stadium. While
acknowledging the antisocial behavior on display, he also points out how
the English press went overboard in its assessment of this photograph.
Wembley’s home turf was damaged, but no one was injured, just the
collective psyche of English football fans. O’Mahony closes this chapter by
discussing advances in digital and screen technology, and he includes a
kiss-cam image of President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama
kissing at a Men’s Olympic basketball game in Washington, D.C.  The fan,
according to O’Mahony, deserves more attention.

    At once scholarly and clear, *Photography and Sport *adds a visual
dimension to the study of sports culture that is compelling, challenging,
and competent. O’Mahony celebrates athletes, fans, and photography in a
narrative that “demonstrates the power of sport to act as a transnational
communicator, crossing both geopolitical and linguistic borders” (174). He
concludes his marvelous book by expressing his hope that sport and
photographs of sport might offer a sliver of hope for a brighter
future—that “imagined community.” No matter what, O’Mahony lays out a solid
appraisal of why sport photography requires greater study and
appreciation.
Remember to smell the roses as you recumber past

Duncan R. Jamieson, Ph. D.
Professor of History
Book Review Editor
*AETHLON: The Journal of Sport Literature*
Ashland University
Ashland, OH  44805
USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ku.edu/pipermail/sport_literature_association/attachments/20200126/f23b3ecd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: O'Mahony, Sport Photography.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 16812 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ku.edu/pipermail/sport_literature_association/attachments/20200126/f23b3ecd/attachment.docx>