<div dir="ltr"><div>All,</div><div>Please find below and attached Jack Ryan's review of Mike O'Mahony'a <i>Sport Photography.</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><i>
</i><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">O’Mahony, Mike. <i>Photography
and Sport. </i>London: Reaktion Books Ltd., 197 pp. </span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 12pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 12pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Reviewed by Jack Ryan<span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;line-height:200%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Writing in the academic
journal, <i>Historical Social Research</i>, Mike O’Mahony, Professor of History
of Art and Visual Culture at the University of Bristol, observes, “Sport, as a
cultural manifestation, might be regarded as primarily a visual experience…. Yet,
whilst the material legacy of sport’s visual culture provides an extensive and
highly valuable resource for research, this has to date been largely untapped”
(28). O’Mahony’s new book, <i>Photography and Sport</i>, an <i>Exposures</i>
monograph published by Reaktion Books, taps that resource. <i>Exposures</i> has
published twenty-two editions to date that explore photography from thematic
perspectives. O’Mahony makes a strong case for sport as a visual experience,
from the beginning of photography to the digital age. </span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;line-height:200%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">
O'Mahony recognizes 1839 as "a propitious one for sport" (7). In the
United Kingdom, horseracing, boating, rugby, and the discovery of rubber, which
would contribute to the global growth of baseball, basketball, golf, and
tennis, combined to usher in decades of sports evolution at all levels:
recreational, amateur, collegiate, and professional. It was also the year that
artist and physicist Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre “announced a new image-making
process, which he called the daguerreotype” (8). O’Mahony sees this invention
as almost more important than the early growth of sports. Together, though,
sport as a significant social activity and photography as art have been twinned
ever since, which O’Mahony celebrates and chronicles in this fascinating book.
O’Mahony complicates the traditional approach to photograph study—observing and
understanding the work of a photographer or a school of photography—by focusing
on sports in all forms and how sports reveal the development of photography. He
uses theoretical approaches in this pursuit, including academic thinkers like
E.P. Thompson, Richard Hoggart, and Raymond Williams, because they transformed
attitudes toward sport as “an integral element within culture and thus a
subject worthy of serious study” (9). O’Mahony’s own thesis is straightforward:
his book explores the broad relationship between sport and photography, and it
recognizes “the centrality of sport as a form of global culture within the
modern world” (11). He also grants that mediated visual representations help to
challenge and refine the definition of sports. </span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;line-height:200%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">
Beyond his foundational introduction, O’Mahony presents seven chapters, each
packed with worthwhile information, solid analysis, and important suggestions
for further study. He moves from early images of Scottish athletes into motion
and movement, the illustrated press, commodification, masculinity, fans and
cultural space, and concludes with the ubiquity of modern sport. This outline
suggests a historical spine; however, O’Mahony’s lively academic style and his
insightful deconstructions of a wide variety of images turn this book into a
cultural study, rather than a historical analysis that offers period specific
appraisal of sports photography. </span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;text-indent:0.5in;line-height:200%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">He opens with Scottish sport and photography due to the fact that
since the birth of photography up to the early 1880s “it was thus predominately
Scottish photographers who played the major role in the representation of
sport” (36). While the chapter primarily centers on the staged images of tennis
players and golfers, O’Mahony expands the chapter by suggesting how early work
still influences contemporary art, such as Rigo 23’s monument to Tommie Smith
and John Carlos on the campus of San José State University and Peter
Hodgkinson’s <i>The Splash</i>, found at Preston North End FC’s grounds. Every
chapter of this wonderfully illustrated text contains surprises like these.
O’Mahony’s voice is not pedantic and his logical, analytic approach seems
flawless. Chapter Four, “Sport Sells,” is particularly compelling. O’Mahony
opens his examination with two images of Frank Gifford, one a monochrome action
photograph of Gifford from 1957 as a New York football Giant, and the other an
image from 1962 showing a reflexed Gifford with a book on his knee and a
cigarette in his right hand. Bridging these two images is a pack of Lucky
Strike cigarettes and a headline declaring, “Get Lucky: the taste to start
with…the taste to stay with.” As O’Mahony writes, “To modern sensibilities,
this image of a popular sporting celebrity not only smoking, but explicitly
promoting the practice, perhaps seems jarring” (91). Briefly, he coverers the
early stages of famous sportsmen and advertisements both in the United States
and the United Kingdom in order to place a “spotlight on the intrinsic
relationship between sport as a social practice and its wider exploitation
within the field of commerce and advertising” (92). One of the most intriguing
aspects of this chapter is the line that O’Mahony draws between Greek
conceptions of the athlete and our contemporary modes of visual representation
of athletes. With a sharp critical cultural eye, O’Mahony concludes the
chapter by inviting others to explore the implications of these mostly male
images: “That sportsmen should so explicitly be deployed to this end perhaps
also reflects a greater concern that still needs to be addressed, namely the
anxieties concerning the continuing presence of homophobic attitudes that
inhabit the wider culture of sport” (108). </span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;line-height:200%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> Ben
Shahan’s famous photograph of two men peering through cracks in a wooden fence,
which is simply captioned <i>Untitled</i>, provides no clues as to what is
happening. Intuitively, it seems as if these depression-era men cannot pay to
see whatever it is beyond the plank fence. Other photographs made at the same
time are more helpful, including an image titled <i>Watching a Football Game,
Star City, West Virginia</i>, which O’Mahony provides, for it contains all the
information needed to understand what these men are doing. As O’Mahony asserts,
“Shahan’s photograph can thus be conceived as operating within a genre that had
come into being virtually as soon as cameras were first brought to sporting
events; namely the imaging of the sports spectator” (133). O’Mahony frames his
discussion of “fan culture and the spaces of sport” by deploying Émile
Durkheim’s theory of “collective effervescence,” originally used to define
religious practices. He complicates things by inviting Benedict Anderson's
theory of an idealized "imagined community" into his analysis. For
example, in the United States, since the 1920s, sports spectatorship marked a
new behavior that attempted to knit the nation together into a mass society,
which never worked at a universal level for a variety of reasons. Of course,
these idealized theories reach a low point in the period covering the mid-1960s
to the late 1980s in Britain with the growth of football hooliganism. O’Mahony
skillfully debunks some of the claims made about a notorious image taken after
Scotland defeated England in 1977 at Wembley Stadium. While acknowledging the
antisocial behavior on display, he also points out how the English press went
overboard in its assessment of this photograph. Wembley’s home turf was
damaged, but no one was injured, just the collective psyche of English football
fans. O’Mahony closes this chapter by discussing advances in digital and screen
technology, and he includes a kiss-cam image of President Barack Obama and
First Lady Michelle Obama kissing at a Men’s Olympic basketball game in
Washington, D.C. The fan, according to O’Mahony, deserves more attention.</span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;line-height:200%;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> At
once scholarly and clear, <i>Photography and Sport </i>adds a visual dimension
to the study of sports culture that is compelling, challenging, and competent.
O’Mahony celebrates athletes, fans, and photography in a narrative that
“demonstrates the power of sport to act as a transnational communicator,
crossing both geopolitical and linguistic borders” (174). He concludes his
marvelous book by expressing his hope that sport and photographs of sport might
offer a sliver of hope for a brighter future—that “imagined community.” No
matter what, O’Mahony lays out a solid appraisal of why sport photography
requires greater study and appreciation. </span><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:200%;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span></span></span></p>
</div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Remember to smell the roses as you recumber past<br><br>Duncan R. Jamieson, Ph. D.<br>Professor of History<br>Book Review Editor<br><i>AETHLON: The Journal of Sport Literature</i><br>Ashland University<br>Ashland, OH 44805<br>USA<br></div></div></div></div>