[Taxacom] Just checking - effective publication in botany - "early view" example...

[Paul van Rijckevorsel]

Make that, duplicate an autonym (i.e. have the same
spelling as an autonym).

Often enough, it will create an autonym if it is the
first name in that rank, under that species name.

Paul


Op 12/05/2021 om 15:54 schreef Paul Kirk:
> And when an epithet moves to an infraspecific rank it must be changed 
> if it would result in the creating of an autonym ...
>
> The other Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> On Behalf Of Paul 
> van Rijckevorsel via Taxacom
> Sent: 12 May 2021 12:33
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu <mailto:taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Just checking - effective publication in botany 
> - "early view" example...
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organisation. Do not 
> click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and 
> know the content is safe.
>
> Op 12/05/2021 om 12:59 schreef Richard Pyle via Taxacom:
> > RE: homotypic synonyms -- in zoology we don't generally use that 
> term (though I think we should), which I gather in non-zoological 
> contexts usually refers to the "same" epithet combined with different 
> genera (e.g., a basionym is a homotypic synonym of a subsequent 
> combination). However, we do have the notion of "objective synonyms", 
> such as when the same specimen has been designated as the name-bearing 
> type for two different species-group epithets (with different 
> spellings, authorships, protologues*, etc.) This is not common, but 
> sometimes happens by accident, and sometimes is done on purpose. But I 
> wonder: do you have situations in Botany where synonyms are 
> "homotypic", even if they are not the "same" epithet combined with 
> different genera (i.e., in cases where they are truly different epithets)?
>
> * * *
>
> Sure, firstly, whenever a name is preoccupied, and a different epithet 
> needs to be adopted (a replacement name).
>
> Secondly, in cases where a move to a different genus would result in a 
> tautonym (when /Leontodon taraxacum/ is moved to /Taraxacum/, the 
> tautonym cannot be published; the species is named /T. officinale/).
>
> Thirdly, when a move to a different rank is made for the first time, a 
> different epithet may be chosen ("A name has no priority outside the 
> rank at which it is published").
>
> And fourthly, as you say, when authors assign the same type, for 
> different names.
>
> Paul
>
> ***
>
> > Aloha,
> > Rich
> >
> > *We don't use the term "protologue" much in zoology either, but 
> again we probably should.
> >
> > Richard L. Pyle, PhD
> > Senior Curator of Ichthyology | Director of XCoRE Bernice Pauahi
> > Bishop Museum
> > 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, HI 96817-2704
> > Office: (808) 848-4115; Fax: (808) 847-8252
> > eMail: deepreef at bishopmuseum.org <mailto:deepreef at bishopmuseum.org>
> > BishopMuseum.org
> > Our Mission: Bishop Museum inspires our community and visitors 
> through the exploration and celebration of the extraordinary history, 
> culture, and environment of Hawaiʻi and the Pacific.
> >
> >>
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com <https://www.avg.com>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu 
> <mailto:taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> For list information; to subscribe 
> or unsubscribe, visit: 
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom 
> <http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom>
> You can reach the person managing the list at: 
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu 
> <mailto:taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> The Taxacom email archive 
> back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org 
> <http://taxacom.markmail.org>
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
>
>
> *Disclaimer*
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and 
> others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking 
> action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly 
> prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been 
> automatically archived by *Mimecast Ltd*, an innovator in Software as 
> a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a *safer* and *more useful* 
> place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, 
> archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here 
> <http://www.mimecast.com/products/>.
>