[Taxacom] Just checking - effective publication in botany - "early view" example...

[Daniel Whitmore]

Hi Paul,

Does it have to state “version of record” or can it just have “published online: [date]”?

Daniel

Sent from my iPhone

> On 9. May 2021, at 07:48, Paul van Rijckevorsel via Taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
> 
> It depends on what "Early view" means. The accepted
> phrase is "Version of Record" (used by Wiley at the
> bottom of each page, if they are consistent): if that is
> used, the paper counts as effectively published.
> 
> Paul
> 
> Op 08/05/2021 om 21:25 schreef Tony Rees via Taxacom:
>> Dear Taxacomers, I am interested in the valid publication (yes/no) of
>> botanical names in a journal "early view" online - in particular the new
>> algal class Olisthodiscophyceae as published in Journal of Phycology "Early
>> View" at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpy.13155 . From
>> my reading of the ICNafp (Shenzhen Code, 2018) the new name/s published
>> therein should be validly published, no? Relevant ICN articles and text
>> read:
>> 
>> *29.1.* Publication is effected, under this *Code,* by distribution of
>> printed matter (through sale, exchange, or gift) to the general public or
>> at least to scientific institutions with generally accessible libraries.
>> Publication is also effected by distribution on or after 1 January 2012 of
>> electronic material in Portable Document Format (PDF; see also Art. 29.3
>> <https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_29.html#Art29.3>and Rec.
>> 29A.1 <https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_29.html#Rec29A.1>)
>> in an online publication with an International Standard Serial Number
>> (ISSN) or an International Standard Book Number (ISBN).
>> 
>> [...]
>> *30.2.* An electronic publication is not effectively published if there is
>> evidence within or associated with the publication that its content is
>> merely preliminary and was, or is to be, replaced by content that the
>> publisher considers final, in which case only the version with that final
>> content is effectively published.
>> 
>> *Ex.* *2.* *“Rodaucea”* was published in a paper first placed online on 12
>> January 2012 as a PDF document accessible through the website of the
>> journal *Mycologia* (ISSN 0027-5514, print; ISSN 1557-2436, online). That
>> document had a header stating “In Press”, and on the journal website it was
>> qualified as “Preliminary version”, which is clear evidence that it was not
>> considered by the publisher as final. Because the final version of the
>> document appeared simultaneously online and in print, a correct citation of
>> the name is: *Rodaucea *W. Rossi & Santam. in Mycologia 104 (print and
>> online): 785. 11 Jun 2012.
>> 
>> *Ex.* *3.* *“Lycopinae”* appeared in a paper first placed online on 26
>> April 2012 as an “Advance Access” PDF document accessible through the
>> website of the *American Journal of Botany* (ISSN 0002-9122, print; ISSN
>> 1537-2197, online). Because the journal website stated (May 2012) “AJB
>> Advance Access articles … have not yet been printed or posted online by
>> issue” and “minor corrections may be made before the issue is released”,
>> this was evidently not considered the final version by the publisher. The
>> name *Lycopinae* B. T. Drew & Sytsma was validly published in Amer. J. Bot.
>> 99: 945. 1 May 2012, when the printed volume containing it was effectively
>> published.
>> 
>> *Ex.* *4.* The paper (in S. African J. Bot. 80: 63–66; ISSN 0254-6299) in
>> which the name *Nanobubon hypogaeum* J. Magee appeared was effectively
>> published online as a PDF document on 30 March 2012 in its “final and fully
>> citable” form, prior to publication of the printed version (May 2012).
>> Papers that appeared online in the same journal under the heading “In Press
>> Corrected Proof” are not effectively published because the journal website
>> clearly stated “Corrected proofs: articles that contain the authors’
>> corrections. Final citation details, e.g. volume/issue number, publication
>> year and page numbers, still need to be added and the text might change
>> before final publication.”
>> 
>> *Note* *1*. An electronic publication may be a final version even if
>> details, e.g. volume, issue, article, or page numbers, are to be added or
>> changed, provided that those details are not part of the content (see Art.
>> 30.3 <https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_30.html#Art30.3>).
>> 
>> *30.3.* Content of an electronic publication includes that which is visible
>> on the page, e.g. text, tables, illustrations, etc., but it excludes
>> volume, issue, article, and page numbers; it also excludes external sources
>> accessed via a hyperlink or URL (Uniform Resource Locator).
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for any comments on this particular published work,
>> 
>> Regards - Tony
>> 
>> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
>> https://about.me/TonyRees
>> www.irmng.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> 
>> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>> 
>> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> 
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
> 
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.