[Taxacom] Correcting higher taxon terminations in botany ( a question of stems)

Paul Kirk P.Kirk at kew.org
Sun Jul 25 16:39:27 CDT 2021



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kirk 
Sent: 25 July 2021 22:39
To: Kenneth Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Correcting higher taxon terminations in botany ( a question of stems)

Scleroderma is not a plant ...

Paul
(Mycologist)

-----Original Message-----
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> On Behalf Of Kenneth Kinman via Taxacom
Sent: 25 July 2021 22:22
To: taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Correcting higher taxon terminations in botany ( a question of stems)

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

Followup,
        Article 18 concerning botanical family names gives the following example (in Ex. 1):  Sclerodermataceae from Scleroderma (Sclerodermatos being the genitive):   https://www.bgbm.org/iapt/nomenclature/code/SaintLouis/0022Ch3Sec2a018.htm


________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Kenneth Kinman via Taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 3:50 PM
To: taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Correcting higher taxon terminations in botany ( a question of stems)

Hi Tony,
        The longer AlgaeBase names look correct to me.  It's probably similar to why we have Zygnematales (not Zygnemales).  It think it has something to do with "derma" being Greek and changing it to the genitive case.   Thus we have dermatologists, not dermologists.  Not sure what article in the Botanical Code would provide the exact reason.
                  -------------Ken

________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Tony Rees via Taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 2:39 PM
To: taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Subject: [Taxacom] Correcting higher taxon terminations in botany ( a question of stems)

Greetings Taxacomers,

In 2020, Marin & Melkonian (in Li et al., Nature Ecology & Evolution 4:
1220-1231, supplement), established a new division (=phylum), class, order and family of "plants" / "algae", as follows:

Prasinodermophyta B. Marin & Melkonian divisio nova Prasinodermophyceae B. Marin & Melkonian classis nova Prasinodermales B. Marin & Melkonian ordo novis Prasinodermaceae B. Marin & Melkonian familia nova

all names based on the type genus name which is Prasinoderma Hasegawa & Chihara in Hasegawa et al. (1996)

These names have been entered into AlgaeBase (present version) but with a modified stem, namely Prasinodermatophyta,  Prasinodermatophyceae, Prasinodermatales and Prasinodatermaceae, but without further explanation so far as I can see. So my question is, which form(s) would be correct to use in my own compendium, with relevant explanation as needed?

Article 16 in the current Code (
https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_16.html) covers "NAMES OF TAXA ABOVE THE RANK OF FAMILY" but not this particular issue, again so far as I can see.

Advice appreciated, as usual...

Regards from Australia,

Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
https://about.me/TonyRees
http://www.irmng.org<http://www.irmng.org>
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org

Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website.


More information about the Taxacom mailing list