[Taxacom] General call to collaboration
John Grehan
calabar.john at gmail.com
Mon Feb 15 12:10:19 CST 2021
It would be rather ironic if, in the future, the only 'valid' DNA
characteristics for species and their relationships were those that were
correlated with, or involved in the formation of, morphogenetic features.
Good thing that this question won't be resolved until long after I have
departed, so I won't have to eat my hat - at least not in this life.
Cheers, John Grehan
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:18 AM David Campbell via Taxacom <
taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
> As a paleontologist (who also does DNA work on modern taxa), I would point
> out that not all taxa are amenable to molecular analysis. Barcodes are
> useful in many taxa (and better as a diagnosis than the genus name based on
> length of ITS1), but far from inerrant - certain groups of snails have
> unexplained divergent mitochondrial sequences, for example.
>
>
> >
>
> --
> Dr. David Campbell
> Associate Professor, Geology
> Department of Natural Sciences
> 110 S Main St, #7270
> Gardner-Webb University
> Boiling Springs NC 28017
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list