[Taxacom] possible genus homonym nomenclatural question
David Campbell
pleuronaia at gmail.com
Sat Jun 13 15:46:12 CDT 2020
Based on https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/120189#page/25/mode/1up ,
Walker seems to just be citing Hübner and doesn't seem to indicate any
intent to make a change. The citation is just "Calymna, p. Hubn. Verz.
Schmett. 281. " (as a synonym). If lepidopterists know that Walker was in
the habit of "correcting" names, that would complicate things.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 1:08 AM Stephen Thorpe via Taxacom <
taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
> Oh dear, I fear another nomenclatural tangle: the problem is Calymna
> Walker, 1856 as a justified or unjustified emendation or as simply a
> misspelling pro Calymma Huebner, 1823?Stephen
> On Saturday, 13 June 2020, 10:30:53 am NZST, Tony Rees via Taxacom <
> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
>
> Adam's answer is the correct one, however for completeness, it is possibly
> worth noting that in botany (under the ICN), names with such minor spelling
> differences may be treated as homonyms in some cases. This is one of the
> areas where the two Codes differ. See:
>
> 53.2. When two or more names of genera or species based on different types
> are so similar that they are likely to be confused (because they are
> applied to related taxa or for any other reason) they are to be treated as
> homonyms (see also Art. 61.5). If established practice has been to treat
> two similar names as homonyms, this practice is to be continued if it is in
> the interest of nomenclatural stability.
>
> *Ex. 8. Names treated as homonyms: Asterostemma Decne. (in Ann. Sci. Nat.,
> Bot., ser. 2, 9: 271. 1838) and Astrostemma Benth. (in Hooker’s Icon. Pl.
> 14: 7. 1880); Pleuropetalum Hook. f. (in London J. Bot. 5: 108. 1846) and
> Pleuripetalum T. Durand (Index Gen. Phan.: 493. 1888); Eschweilera DC.
> (Prodr. 3: 293. 1828) and Eschweileria Boerl. (in Ann. Jard. Bot.
> Buitenzorg 6: 106, 112. 1887); Skytanthus Meyen (Reise 1: 376. 1834) and
> Scytanthus Hook. (in Icon. Pl. 7: ad t. 605–606. 1844).
>
> (plus some further examples) - Shenzhen Code, 2018
>
> Regards - Tony
> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
> https://about.me/TonyRees
> www.irmng.org
>
>
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 04:01, John Grehan via Taxacom <
> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
>
> > Thanks to those who responded already. As I suspected - I missed the
> > 'obvious' as it is a spelling difference (m instead of an n). So all is
> > clear now. And the 'butterfly' name is actually for a moth to be precise.
> >
> > John Grehan
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 1:34 PM John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear colleagues,
> > >
> > > A friend of mine asked about why the genus name Clymna Hutton 1883 for
> a
> > > group of snails is not a homonym a butterfly genus of the same name
> > > under Calymma Hübner, 1823 (
> > >
> >
> https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/data/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=4898.0
> > > )
> > >
> > > If it is a homonym then the synonymy of the snail genus Flammocharopa
> > > under Calymna Hutton, 1883 would presumably be incorrect (see
> > > https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=820085 )
> > >
> > > Perhaps I have missed something obvious, but I would be grateful for
> > > insight from any on this list well acquainted with such issues. And
> > please,
> > > for those of you inclined to respond with unkind remarks about my
> > knowledge
> > > or understanding of nomenclature, keep them to yourselves. I am not
> > > interested. Hopefully someone will be able to provide
> > > clarification/corroboration of my current inference.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > John Grehan
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> >
> > Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > You can reach the person managing the list at:
> > taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> > http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years,
> 1987-2020.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years, 1987-2020.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for about 33 years, 1987-2020.
>
--
Dr. David Campbell
Associate Professor, Geology
Department of Natural Sciences
Box 7270
Gardner-Webb University
Boiling Springs NC 28017
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list