[Taxacom] Fwd: Zootaxa taken off of JCR
Doug Yanega
dyanega at ucr.edu
Fri Jul 3 11:02:39 CDT 2020
Some (many?) of you may have heard that some major taxonomic journals,
including Zootaxa and the International Journal of Systematic and
Evolutionary Microbiology, have just been removed entirely from Impact
Factor indexing, jeopardizing the future of taxonomic research by
penalizing taxonomists who choose and have chosen to publish in these or
other suppressed journals.
For those who find this a significant concern, I am sharing below a
message from Frank-Thorsten Krell, a fellow ICZN Commissioner, which
gives some useful background and relevant links. I have the sense,
likely shared by others, that this may be a /fait accompli/, a decision
not subject to review or reversal, but *maybe* there are some human
beings involved in this decision who can be contacted and persuaded to
reconsider. Some of the information Frank presents below may be helpful
in making the case.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Zootaxa taken off of JCR
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 05:33:35 +0000
From: Frank T. Krell <Frank.Krell at dmns.org>
To: (recipient list suppressed)
I have written about impact factor suppression six years ago:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270396659_Losing_the_numbers_game_abundant_journal_self-citations_put_journals_at_risk_for_a_life_without_Impact_Factor
Abstract: “To counteract impact factor manipulations by editors, in
2008 Thomson Reuters started suppressing journals with abundant
self-citations and excluding them from the Journal Citation Reports® for
two years. The number of banned journals rose from 9 in 2007 to 66 in
2012. Abundant journal self-citations can be due to the nature of the
journal or unethical strategies of editors, such as coercive citations
or citation cartels. Regardless of whether unethical behaviour was
involved, journals with excessive self-citations are suppressed by
Thomson Reuters. While unethical behaviour should be discouraged,
depriving the accused journals of the benefit of the doubt can lead to
unfair treatment.”
Now Zootaxa, but also the International Journal of Systematic and
Evolutionary Microbiology, the official journal of record for new
microbial taxa, fell into that trap.
Yesterday I submitted a Correspondence to Nature about that (which will
be rejected in about 15 days – or not):
“Impact Factor—Taxonomy cannot win
Twenty years ago, I laid out why Impact Factors don’t work as
performance indicators for taxonomic research (Nature *405*, 507–508;
2000; *415*, 957; 2002), referring to the lack of core-journals as one
of the reasons. While taxonomical publishing is still extremely
fragmented, more than most other fields, there are examples of
successful consolidation. One is /Zootaxa/, a mega-journal that
meanwhile publishes about 25% of all new zoological species and other
taxa (Z.-Q. Zhang, /Zootaxa/ *4000*, 596–600; 2015). Another example is
the /International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology/,
the official journal of record for new microbial taxa. According to the
/International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes/, all new prokaryote
names have to be published or get validated in this one journal (C.T.
Parker /et al./, /Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microb./ *69*, S1–S111; 2019). Now
Clarivate Plc, the owner of the Journal Impact Factor, has revoked the
2019 Impact Factors for both those and 31 other journals because of
their high rate of journal self-citations
(https://retractionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Title-Suppress-2.pdf).
Revoking Journal Impact Factors has been a means to fight attempts of
citation manipulations by journals since 2008 (F.-T. Krell, /Eur. Sci.
Ed./ *40*, 36–38; 2014). However, in journals dominating a field or
being a mandatory outlet, such high rates are expected and unavoidable,
and not necessarily indicating a manipulative strategy. Depriving
leading taxonomic journals of their Journal Impact Factors can have
devastating effects on the evaluation of taxonomists and on taxonomy as
a whole, as long as this metric is still used as a performance indicator
for publishing scientists.
*Frank-T. Krell *Denver Museum of Nature & Science, Denver, USA.
frank.krell at dmns.org <mailto:frank.krell at dmns.org>”
Here are the links to the referenced Nature correspondences:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12467244_Impact_factors_aren%27t_relevant_to_taxonomy
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11486254_Why_impact_factors_don%27t_work_for_taxonomy
This action of Clarivate can have extremely negative consequences for
taxonomists evaluated by Impact Factor-counters. It can have negative
consequences for Zootaxa. It can even have negative consequences for
taxonomy as a whole as one of the most prominent taxonomic outlets is
now no longer an option for many academic taxonomists. Very bad and
annoying.
I see little hope that academic administrators around the world will
suddenly become educated and understand the shortcomings of the Journal
Impact Factor. I would guess that the Impact Factor is here to stay and
will be senselessly applied to evaluate scientists. Oh, I wrote about
that, too:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267329241_The_Journal_Impact_Factor_as_a_performance_indicator
This only for people who want to know more about the Impact Factor game.
We need to consider how taxonomy and success of taxonomists are
evaluated and measured in academia. Publications are key. For our long
term strategy, we need to avoid all unintended consequences that further
harm the taxonomic enterprise (additionally to lack of funding,
increasing, often lethal red tape, lack of career opportunities for new
blood, etc. etc.).
Cheers
Frank
Dr. Frank-Thorsten Krell
Senior Curator of Entomology, Editor-in-Chief
Commissioner and Councillor, International Commission on Zoological
Nomenclature
Department of Zoology
Denver Museum of Nature & Science
2001 Colorado Blvd
Denver, Colorado 80205-5798, U.S.A.
Frank.krell at dmns.org <mailto:Frank.krell at dmns.org>
Phone 303.370.8244
Fax 303.331.6492
https://www.dmns.org/science/zoology/staff/frank-krell/
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list