[Taxacom] is different ending for gender a synonym

[Gurcharan Singh]

I would say all objective synonyms based on same type (which obviously they
are), with same epithet (subject to change linked with gender of generic
name). One would be accepted name based taxonomic judgement (to which genus
species should be assigned), others listed as its synonyms.That is a common
practice in plant names also.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazoryctra_hyperboreus






Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired  Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Mob: 9810359089
https://sing96.wixsite.com/mysite-1


On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 10:56 AM Tony Rees via Taxacom <
taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Technically it is not a synonym (in zoology, that would have to be a
> different epithet entirely, or perhaps the same one with a different
> authority and based on a different type) but a variant or incorrect
> orthography (according to the Code only the one that is in gender agreement
> would be correct). However you could include it in a synonyms list in my
> view, with an appropriate note - along with other things that may not
> technically be synonyms such as nomina nuda, alternative combinations,
> etc., which often also appear in "synonyms" lists (as other names that have
> been applied to this taxon) but are not synonyms in the strict sense. Just
> my 2 cents of course...
>
> Regards - Tony
>
> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
> https://about.me/TonyRees
>
>
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 15:16, John Grehan via Taxacom <
> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
>
> > I'm compiling synonyms for species in a taxonomic list and I am curious
> to
> > know if there is a standard view of what happens with different
> > gender endings - whether they are considered synonyms that should be
> > listed. For example, Moschler 1826 named Epialus hyperboreus which was
> > later transferred to Gazoryctra as hperborea - presumably to match the
> > gender, but then later the species was listed by the same author along
> with
> > some others (Nielsen et al 2000) as  Gazoryctra hyperboreus,
> > reflecting their view that species endings should stay with the original.
> > I'm not worried about arguments over that choice, but whether these names
> > are formal synonyms. Nielsen et al (2000) did not list hyperborea as a
> > synonym, but I noticed that it was listed as a synonym on a taxonomic
> > website  https://ftp.funet.fi/
> >
> > So, is there any formal criterion or is it just a matter of personal
> > viewpoint as to whether the different endings constitute synonyms?
> >
> > Thanks for any input on this.
> >
> > John Grehan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> >
> > Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > You can reach the person managing the list at:
> > taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> > http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for 32 some years, 1987-2019.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for 32 some years, 1987-2019.
>