[Taxacom] Type species from unavailable genus name

[Francisco Welter-Schultes]

Dear Mikhail,
It would be useful to know the involved names. I understand that 
somespecies was established in genus A at that pre-1931 occasion? Then 
it should read B. somespecies (Originalauthor, Year).

Many considerations can come in between. Genus A could have been made 
available by a subsequent author who just mentioned this genus with a 
short description and with one species included (type by monotypy), 
previous to the publication of genus B. Types can occasionally also be 
fixed by absolute tautonymy.

Francisco

-----
Francisco Welter-Schultes

Am 11.05.2018 um 15:40 schrieb Mikhail Daneliya:
> Genus A was described for two species after 1931, but type species was not
> designated. The genus name A is thus unavailable. Despite that more species
> under genus name A have been described subsequently. One of them seems to
> be a new genus B, with a type species by monotypy. What is the correct name
> for the type species? A. somespecies Originalauthor, Year; B. somespecies
> (Originalauthor, Year); or else?
> Appreciate your help!
> 
> Mikhail Daneliya
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> 
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> 
> Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
>