[Taxacom] What is Homo sapiens
Gerald Schneeweiss
gerald.schneeweiss at univie.ac.at
Fri Jun 1 12:18:47 CDT 2018
Hi Adam,
this question has been recently addressed inĀ a group of European
mountain plants: Dillenberger and Kadereit (2017): Simultaneous
speciation in the European high mountain flowering plant genus Facchinia
(Minuartia s.l., Caryophyllaceae) revealed by genotyping-by-sequencing.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 112: 23-35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.04.016
The geographic setting is different, bus island-like, i.e.,
geographically distinct refugia in the Alps imposed by Pleistocene
glacial advances. For my two pennies worth: Irrespective of that the
approaches used by the authors are not optimal in this context (they
used tree reconstruction methods, but coalescent-based simulations would
have been better, I assume) it will probably remain difficult to prove
simultaneous speciation, as one needs to show that any hard polytomy (or
failure to support a model of non-simultaneous divergence) is not just
due to too few data.
Best wishes
Gerald
> This is one point I have been thinking about for the past day or so as
> a result of posts on Taxacom.
>
> Generally it is assumed that when a tree has multiple branches arising
> from a single node it must be poorly resolved. However, it occurred to
> me that it is quite possible that several new species could arise
> simultaneously from a single ancestor species.
>
> I can easily envisage that when sea level was lower a single species
> could have inhabited what are now the islands of Indonesia, for
> example. Rising sea levels would then isolate the populations on each
> island, and over time they would speciate, creating a number of
> different species at the same time (not instantaneous of course) from
> a single ancestor species.
>
> Is there a way to test whether such a node is reliable? I should
> mention that I do not actually run analyses myself; I am more of a
> traditional taxonomist involved in DNA research, partly to ensure that
> the taxa are correctly identified. It is quite possible there is an
> obvious answer to my question, and if so I would be interested to hear
> it.
>
> Adam.
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>
> Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
--
Gerald M. Schneeweiss, Assoc.-Prof. Dr.
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research
University of Vienna
http://plantbiogeography.univie.ac.at
MASTER'S PROGRAM BOTANY AT UNIVIERSITY OF VIENNA:
http://master-program-botany.univie.ac.at/
Botany Vienna on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ViennaBotany/
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list