[Taxacom] Elimination of paraphyly: sensible or not?
Kenneth Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 9 17:05:23 CST 2018
Hi Richard,
Do you have any opinion on Horandl and Stuessy's 2010 paper in the journal Taxon ( "Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification" ).
For anyone who has not read it, it can be found it here:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Elvira_Hoerandl/publication/230818733_Paraphyletic_groups_as_natural_units_of_biological_classification/links/0912f504f1250eb15b000000/Paraphyletic-groups-as-natural-units-of-biological-classification.pdf
________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Richard Zander <Richard.Zander at mobot.org>
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 4:45 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Elimination of paraphyly: sensible or not?
Paraphyly is not a process in nature. It models nothing real. It is a gimmick used by cladists because there is no innate taxon concept in cladistics. It occurs when one taxon generates one or more other taxa of the same taxonomic level.
Phylogenetics is not the study of evolution. It is the study of dichotomous trees generated by non-ultrametric cluster analysis using character state changes. Cladistics is better at grouping evolutionarily related taxa than cluster analysis by overall similarity, but it does not model an evolutionary tree.
To study evolutionary trees you need to be aware of (have information about) radiation of descendants from progenitors. Trees restricted to sister groups do not allow hypotheses of serial evolution.
This discussion is about classification based on a particular kind of cluster analysis, not evolution. Classification should reflect what we know about evolution, not cluster analysis.
-------
Richard H. Zander
Missouri Botanical Garden – 4344 Shaw Blvd. – St. Louis – Missouri – 63110 – USA
richard.zander at mobot.org
Web sites: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm and http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/
bfnamenu - Missouri Botanical Garden<http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm>
www.mobot.org
B ryophyte F lora of N orth A merica. W EB S ITE . MENU • The Treatments: Descriptions, Keys, and Illustrations • Participants, Guides for Authors, and References
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
Taxacom Info Page - mailman.nhm.ku.edu Mailing Lists<http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom>
mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Taxacom is an e-mail list for biological systematics. Named and brought to life by Drs. Richard Zander and Patricia Eckel, Taxacom began its peripatetic existence on ...
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
[http://taxacom.markmail.org/images/hdi_office.gif]<http://taxacom.markmail.org/>
Taxacom Home - MarkMail - Community libraries<http://taxacom.markmail.org/>
taxacom.markmail.org
MarkMail is developed and hosted by MarkLogic Corporation. MarkMail is a free service for searching mailing list archives, with huge advantages over traditional ...
Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
Taxacom Info Page - mailman.nhm.ku.edu Mailing Lists<http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom>
mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Taxacom is an e-mail list for biological systematics. Named and brought to life by Drs. Richard Zander and Patricia Eckel, Taxacom began its peripatetic existence on ...
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list