[Taxacom] Does a misspelling merit parentheses?
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Wed Apr 11 15:46:24 CDT 2018
It would be interesting to check some actual cases of unjustified emendations used as valid replacement names, to see how they have actually been treated. Does anyone know of any such real cases?
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 11/4/18, Francisco Welter-Schultes <fwelter at gwdg.de> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Does a misspelling merit parentheses?
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Received: Wednesday, 11 April, 2018, 10:33 PM
Adam, what you suggest is the
spirit we would extract behind the rules.
Parentheses should only be set if a species is
transferred to a
different genus, and not
to the same genus for which a slightly
different spelling is used. No matter if
emendation or incorrect
subsequent
spelling.
Thomas
highlighted the need to look closely at the Code's
rules, and
extracted in theory a case where
this spirit is not covered. I would not
tend to neglect that.
If the Code is not robust enough to cover all
possible cases, I think in
such a case
there is a need to align the Code and to cover all those
cases in the sense of that spirit. This would
be the best solution,
since it seems to
reflect current practice, and only very few people are
even able to discover exceptions of this
rule.
Francisco
-----
Francisco Welter-Schultes
Am 11.04.2018 um 10:31 schrieb Adam Cotton:
> ----- Original Message ----- From:
"Stephen Thorpe"
> <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
> To: <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>;
"Thomas Pape" <tpape at snm.ku.dk>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 6:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Does a misspelling
merit parentheses?
>
>
>> This is still a
bit unclear:
>>
>> 33.2.3. Any other emendation is an
"unjustified emendation"; the name
>> thus emended is available and it has
its own author and date and is a
>>
junior objective synonym of the name in its original
spelling; it
>> enters into homonymy
and can be used as a substitute name, but
>>
>> 33.2.3.1.
when an unjustified emendation is in prevailing usage and is
>> attributed to the original author
and date it is deemed to be a
>>
justified emendation.
>>
>> This suggests that an unjustified
emendation cannot be used as a valid
>> name without thereby being deemed a
justified emendation, so, in the
>>
context of this thread, still no parentheses required (by
Art. 51.3.1)
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>
>
> I have been
following this thread, and have been somewhat puzzled why
> there is a suggestion of an apparent
issue of whether or not parentheses
>
are required.
>
> As
far as I understand the Code, parentheses are required after
a
> species is transferred from the
original genus it was described in and
>
placed in a different genus.
>
> Surely emendation of the same genus name,
whether justified or not, is
> not a
case of moving the species to a different genus, and thus no
> parentheses are needed.
>
> Adam.
>
_______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Send Taxacom mailing
list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web,
visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list
at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>
> Nurturing Nuance
while Assaulting Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Send Taxacom mailing list
submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit:
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at:
taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Nurturing Nuance while
Assaulting Ambiguity for 31 Some Years, 1987-2018.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list