[Taxacom] Were bivalves the first molluscs to evolve?
John Grehan
calabar.john at gmail.com
Wed Nov 22 12:23:38 CST 2017
This nicely points to the generally insoluble (in principle where both are
robust) problem of conflicting DNA sequence and morphological trees.
John Grehan
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Kenneth Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was reading an article on the evolution of brains, and the author
> says "Meanwhile, bivalves possess just simple nerve nets. You might think
> that bivalves came first, while the cephalopods emerged later, because
> simple brains should, in theory, predate complex brains." But he then says
> that DNA tells a different story.
>
> I'm still of the opinion that cladograms of Phylum Mollusca would
> very well be mis-rooted, and that bivalves (with their simple nerve nets)
> did come first. Below is the cladogram that I presented here on Taxacom
> way back in August 2002. And below that the characters upon which this
> branching pattern is based. Are there any obvious errors in this
> branching pattern, and if not, could it be that molecular phylogenies for
> Mollusca are still mis-rooted?
>
> ----------Ken
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> >>
> >>\________ Protobranchia
> >>1\
> >> \________ Lamellibranchia
> >> 2\
> >> \___________ EUTHYNEURA
> >> \ \________Cephalopoda
> >> 3\
> >> \___ STREPTONEURA (real torsion)
> >> 4\
> >> \_______ Monoplacophora
> >> 5\
> >> \______ Polyplacophora
> >> 6\
> >> \_______ Aplacophora
> >>
> >>
> >>1. Veliger larvae evolve.**
> >> Gills become lamellate.
> >> Crystalline style evolves.**
> >>
> >>2. Simple radulae evolve.
> >> Thus abandon filter-feeding.
> >> Cleavage becomes unequal.
> >> Buccal development begins.
> >> Adductors reduced from 2 to 1 (or 0).
> >> Unskeletonized gills?
> >> Shells more "opisthobranch"-like.**
> >> Gastropodan muscle fine structure.**
> >>
> >>3. Radulae become more complex,
> >> with increasing numbers of
> >> teeth per transverse row.**
> >> MESENTOBLAST (4d) formation
> >> begins to come after the
> >> 24-cell stage (usually 40-63).
> >>
> >>4. "Segmentation" arises.**
> >> 8 pairs of pedal retractors.
> >> More than 6 pairs of dorsoventral
> >> muscle bundles (DVM).
> >> Over two pairs of ctenidia.**
> >> Radula bolster vesicles increase.
> >>
> >>5. Single conch ---> multiple plates.**
> >> Spicules develop (7 rows**).
> >> Even more pairs of DVM (is not
> >> fission as likely as fusion!?)
> >> Musculature develops beneath mantle.
> >> Head appendages lost.
> >> Statocysts lost?
> >> MESENTOBLAST formation occurs
> >> after 63-cell stage.
> >>
> >>6. Radular reduction.
> >> Plates lost.
> >> Muscular foot reduced.
> >> Numbers of ctenidia reduced.
> >> More than 16 prs. of DVM (certainly
> >> no reversal here).
> >> Gametes usually exit via pericardia
> >> (those which don't are probably
> >> basal aplacophorans).
> >>
> NOTE: ** indicates that the synapomorphy is subject to reversals or
> other modifications down the line.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------
> Here's a weblink to the article on the evolution of brains:
> https://io9.gizmodo.com/how-did-brains-evolve-1653897356
>
>
> [https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--
> qbRAJ4mk--/c_fill,fl_progressive,g_center,h_450,q_
> 80,w_800/tgtftblcjzufzhgapq4u.jpg]<https://io9.gizmodo.com/
> how-did-brains-evolve-1653897356>
>
> How Did Brains Evolve? - io9<https://io9.gizmodo.com/
> how-did-brains-evolve-1653897356>
> io9.gizmodo.com
> Humans have asked where we come from for thousands of years, across all
> cultures. But only recently have we started to address the mystery of the
> evolution of the ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>
> Nurturing Nuance while Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Some Years, 1987-2017.
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list