[Taxacom] monotypic or monobasic

Stephen Thorpe stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Thu Dec 14 14:13:15 CST 2017


"Monobasic" certainly is (or was) also used in taxonomy, but perhaps not so much now, and any Google search only turns up the chemistry meaning.

Stephen

--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 15/12/17, Lynn Raw <lynn at afriherp.org> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Taxacom] monotypic or monobasic
 To: "Stephen Thorpe" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
 Cc: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>, "Paul van Rijckevorsel" <dipteryx at freeler.nl>
 Received: Friday, 15 December, 2017, 8:18 AM
 
 From what I understand, monobasic
 is a term used in chemistry while monotypic is a term used
 in taxonomy and nomenclature. Definitions of both terms are
 available in good dictionaries or even on the web.
 
 Lynn Raw
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 > On 14 Dec 2017, at 09:49, Stephen Thorpe
 <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
 wrote:
 > 
 > Monotypy
 is a nomenclatural term (ICZN) in relation to the fixation
 of a type species of a new genus, but the grammatical
 variant monotypic has broader meaning. It is perhaps ugly to
 have variants of the same term with different meanings (one
 broader than the other)!
 > 
 > Stephen
 > 
 >
 --------------------------------------------
 > On Thu, 14/12/17, Paul van Rijckevorsel
 <dipteryx at freeler.nl>
 wrote:
 > 
 > Subject:
 Re: [Taxacom] monotypic or monobasic
 >
 To: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
 > Received: Thursday, 14 December, 2017,
 9:32 PM
 > 
 > The
 correct term should be
 >
 "unispecific".
 > 
 > The term "monotypic" sounds
 > nomenclatural, and
 >
 indeed has been defined
 > as a
 nomenclatural term
 > in the ICNafp. By
 > contrast, "unispecific"
 represents
 > a taxonomic concept
 > 
 > Sometimes
 "monospecific" can be
 > found,
 but this
 > is ugly, as it is a hybrid
 > combining a Greek and a
 > Latin word
 >
 element.
 > 
 > Paul
 > 
 > ----- Original
 Message -----
 > 
 >
 From: "Stephen Thorpe" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
 > To: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>;
 > "John Grehan" 
 > <calabar.john at gmail.com>
 > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:44
 AM
 > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] monotypic
 or
 > monobasic
 > 
 > 
 >> I expect that
 these terms don't have
 > very precise
 definitions and that 
 >> there
 > may be a fair amount of variation in exact
 usage. My feeling
 > is that 
 >> "monobasic" isn't
 > used much any more. It presumably means
 "with a single
 > 
 >> basis", i.e. "based on a
 > single species". Monotypic presumably
 means "based
 > 
 >> on a single type", though
 > "type" should, I think, be
 interpreted in the 
 >> general sense,
 not as types in the
 > nomenclatural sense
 (i.e. type species 
 >> or type
 specimens), which is a possible
 > source
 of confusion. So, a genus 
 >> with
 > just one species regarded as valid would
 be monotypic, even
 > if the 
 >> single species had synonyms (and
 > therefore more than one type specimen 
 >> included). All nominal genera
 obviously
 > have only one type species,
 whether 
 >> or
 >
 not the genus is monotypic! Monotypy is the act of basing
 a
 > new genus on 
 >> a single species. I have
 > never seen or heard the term
 "monobasy"! I also
 > 
 >> don't think that these terms
 apply
 > to species, i.e. basing a new
 species on 
 >> a single specimen
 doesn't make the
 > species
 mono-anything!
 >> Stephen
 >> 
 >> 
 >
 --------------------------------------------
 >> On Thu, 14/12/17, John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com>
 > wrote:
 >> 
 >> Subject:
 >
 [Taxacom] monotypic or monobasic
 >>
 To:
 > "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
 >> Received: Thursday, 14 December,
 2017,
 > 6:07 PM
 >>
 
 >> Dear
 >
 colleagues,
 >> 
 >> I have
 > seen the
 terms 'monotypic' and
 >> 
 > 'monobasic' applied to genera with
 a
 >> single species. I am curious to
 know if
 >> there is a technically
 correct
 >> choice for the use of these
 terms for
 >> such genera. If anyone
 may be able to
 >> enlighten me as to
 the rules, if any,
 >> governing how
 these terms are
 >> properly used I
 would be most
 >> grateful.
 >> 
 >> John
 Grehan
 >> 
 >
 _______________________________________________
 >> Taxacom Mailing List
 >> 
 > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
 >> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 >> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may
 be
 >> searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
 >> 
 >> Send Taxacom
 mailing
 > list submissions
 >> to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
 >> Web, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 >> You can reach the person managing
 the
 >> list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 >> 
 >> Nurturing
 Nuance
 > while Assaulting
 >> Ambiguity for 30 Some
 > Years, 1987-2017.
 >>
 
 >> 
 >
 _______________________________________________
 >> Taxacom Mailing List
 >> 
 > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
 >> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 >> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may
 be
 > searched at: 
 >> http://taxacom.markmail.org
 >> 
 >> Send Taxacom
 mailing
 > list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
 Web,
 > visit: 
 >>
 http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 >> You can reach the person managing the
 list
 > at: 
 >> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 >> 
 >> Nurturing
 Nuance
 > while Assaulting Ambiguity for
 30 Some Years, 1987-2017.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 > ---
 >> Deze e-mail
 is gecontroleerd op
 > virussen door
 AVG.
 >> http://www.avg.com
 >> 
 > 
 > 
 >
 _______________________________________________
 > Taxacom Mailing List
 >
 Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
 > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 > The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
 > searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
 > 
 > Send Taxacom mailing
 list
 > submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web,
 visit:
 > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 > You can reach the person managing the list
 at:
 > taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 > 
 > Nurturing Nuance
 while
 > Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Some
 Years, 1987-2017.
 > 
 >
 _______________________________________________
 > Taxacom Mailing List
 >
 Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
 > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 > The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
 searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
 > 
 > Send Taxacom mailing
 list submissions to taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Web,
 visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
 > You can reach the person managing the list
 at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
 > 
 > Nurturing Nuance
 while Assaulting Ambiguity for 30 Some Years, 1987-2017.
 


More information about the Taxacom mailing list