[Taxacom] multiple authors new species
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Wed Sep 14 18:26:10 CDT 2016
Actually John, the zoological code, unlike the botanical code, says very little about how to cite authors, so et al. is fine.
Cheers, Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 15/9/16, John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: [Taxacom] multiple authors new species
To: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Thursday, 15 September, 2016, 11:10 AM
Dear colleagues,
I expect that the answer is somewhere in the Rules of
Zoological
Nomenclature so I hope I will be forgiven my asking such a
simple question
in this venue. What is the recommended or accepted form of
author citation
for a species that has multiple authors, in this case an
insect -
Thitarodes biruensis (Fu and seven other authors, 2002).
Should it be
Thitarodes biruensis (Fu et. al., 2002) or something else?
Its in
parentheses as it was named under a different genus name.
Thank you,
John Grehan
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Injecting Intellectual Liquidity for 29 years.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list