[Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one new species

Dr Brian Taylor dr.brian.taylor at ntlworld.com
Thu Jan 28 17:00:32 CST 2016


Please stop this farce of an unintelligible thread as it is filling my inbox
and swamping other messages.

Brian 


On 28/01/2016, 22:36, "Richard Pyle" <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org> wrote:

> You're trying to bait me again, aren't you? :-)

OK, I'll nibble... 

If the
> Zootaxa model publishes on paper concurrently with the electronic edition, the
> Amendment is completely irrelevant to that model. Most other online publishing
> models (e.g., PLoS, PeerJ, Pensoft, and many, many others) benefit from the
> Amendment far more than the Zootaxa does, and have done so for years
> now.

Coincidence?  You decide...

Rich



> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Stephen Thorpe [mailto:stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
> Sent: Thursday,
> January 28, 2016 12:31 PM
> To: 'Laurent Raty'; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu;
>
> deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
> Cc: j.noyes at nhm.ac.uk; neale at bishopmuseum.org
>
> Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one
>
> new species
> 
> Rich,
> 
> How can you not agree? The Zootaxa model only
> publishes online after
> addition of metadata. Therefore the "metadata
> problem" doesn't arise. Any
> publisher which does publish online before
> metadata has been added, and
> there are plenty who do, is open to the
> "metadata problem". I really don't
> understand how you can fail to agree with
> this! You are not making sense!
> 
> Stephen
> 
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Fri, 29/1/16, Richard Pyle
> <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org> wrote:
> 
>  Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Important note
> Re: two names online published -
> one new species
>  To: "'Stephen Thorpe'"
> <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>, "'Laurent Raty'"
> <l.raty at skynet.be>,
> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>  Cc: j.noyes at nhm.ac.uk, neale at bishopmuseum.org
>
> Received: Friday, 29 January, 2016, 11:26 AM
> 
>  > OK, so you will now
>
> presumably also agree that this problem affects all  > online first papers
>
> which don't  publish using the same model that Zootaxa  > does?
> 
>  Nope. No
> agreement there.
> 
>  Rich
> 
>
> 

_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing
> List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/list
> info/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org

Channeling Intellectual Exuberance for 29 years
> in 2016.






More information about the Taxacom mailing list