[Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one new species
Dr Brian Taylor
dr.brian.taylor at ntlworld.com
Thu Jan 28 17:00:32 CST 2016
Please stop this farce of an unintelligible thread as it is filling my inbox
and swamping other messages.
Brian
On 28/01/2016, 22:36, "Richard Pyle" <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org> wrote:
> You're trying to bait me again, aren't you? :-)
OK, I'll nibble...
If the
> Zootaxa model publishes on paper concurrently with the electronic edition, the
> Amendment is completely irrelevant to that model. Most other online publishing
> models (e.g., PLoS, PeerJ, Pensoft, and many, many others) benefit from the
> Amendment far more than the Zootaxa does, and have done so for years
> now.
Coincidence? You decide...
Rich
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Stephen Thorpe [mailto:stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
> Sent: Thursday,
> January 28, 2016 12:31 PM
> To: 'Laurent Raty'; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu;
>
> deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
> Cc: j.noyes at nhm.ac.uk; neale at bishopmuseum.org
>
> Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one
>
> new species
>
> Rich,
>
> How can you not agree? The Zootaxa model only
> publishes online after
> addition of metadata. Therefore the "metadata
> problem" doesn't arise. Any
> publisher which does publish online before
> metadata has been added, and
> there are plenty who do, is open to the
> "metadata problem". I really don't
> understand how you can fail to agree with
> this! You are not making sense!
>
> Stephen
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Fri, 29/1/16, Richard Pyle
> <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org> wrote:
>
> Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Important note
> Re: two names online published -
> one new species
> To: "'Stephen Thorpe'"
> <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>, "'Laurent Raty'"
> <l.raty at skynet.be>,
> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Cc: j.noyes at nhm.ac.uk, neale at bishopmuseum.org
>
> Received: Friday, 29 January, 2016, 11:26 AM
>
> > OK, so you will now
>
> presumably also agree that this problem affects all > online first papers
>
> which don't publish using the same model that Zootaxa > does?
>
> Nope. No
> agreement there.
>
> Rich
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing
> List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/list
> info/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
Channeling Intellectual Exuberance for 29 years
> in 2016.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list