[Taxacom] Important note Re: two names online published - one new species

[Laurent Raty]

Stephen,

When an early view file issued in 2015 gets included in a 2016 volumes, 
an original statement "Systematic Entomology (2015), DOI: 
10.1111/syen.#####" (as in the yet-to-be-published file here: 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12157/epdf ) is 
*changed* into a statement "Systematic Entomology (2016), 41, ##-##." 
(as in this file: 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12142/epdf , which is 
registered in ZooBank as being published on 12 Aug 2015: 
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoo
bank.org:pub:38D703ED-127A-4DB0-8153-8D78AF4AC212 ).

The year that appears in this statement in the final file (the only one 
that remains) is *not*, nor is even *intended* to be, the year of 
publication of the pdf file that we are trying here to make "published". 
It is the year of publication of the print run.

And of nothing else.

Cheers, Laurent -


On 01/26/2016 08:43 PM, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> Laurent,
>

> You are contrasting "in the work itself" with "metadata", but this
> isnot necessarily so. Remember that the concept of "metadata", as used
> here, didn't exist when the Amendment was drafted. Zhang just
> subsequently pulled it out of a hat in order to try to save the
> Amendment from objections relating to "preliminary versions". Anyway, if
> you contrast "in the work itself" instead with "just on the publisher's
> web page for the article, or elsewhere", then "Systematic Entomology
> (2016), 41, 287–297" is "in the work itself". This seems like a
> reasonable and pragmatic interpretation to make, which avoids this
> particular problem.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephen