[Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sun Jan 17 19:43:34 CST 2016
Lynn,
>it seems that your argument is against publisher profiteering from public funds<
Not entirely. I'm against changing the status quo in such a way that public money intended for research is diverted to profits for publishers. I'd much rather see that money spent on research (since there seems to be precious little of it around here, anyway), unless there are some real benefits from open access, but I'm not convinced that there are such real benefits.
>There are alternative models so why are you not exploring these?<
It makes no difference what I explore. My concern here is just to try to encourage people to think through the issues involved with open access, rather than just blindly accepting all the lobbying for it by stakeholders.
Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 18/1/16, Lynn Raw <lynn at afriherp.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
To: "Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Monday, 18 January, 2016, 2:35 PM
Stephen, it seems that
your argument is against publisher profiteering from public
funds. Maybe if everyone forgot the idea of impact factors
and other measures dreamed up by publishers (I believe these
derive from ISI back in the 1970s) there might be a chance
for other publication models to succeed. There are always
costs even though web data is relatively cheaper than
printing. However meeting actual costs will always be less
that meeting these costs plus whatever profit margin is
needed to satisfy company directors and shareholders. Many
scientific societies and associations have moved from self
publishing to commercial publishing models. I presume there
is a good reason for this but I don’t really understand
why when electronic publication costs could well be
generated through advertising and membership fees. I see
publishers charging over GB£30 for access to papers that
they do not even hold the copyright to yet they get away
with it. You may be surprised to learn that in the UK today
there are at least two major printed daily newspapers that
are provided free to thousands of readers. These are open
access print newspapers whose revenue is generated without
charging the readers or obtaining public funding. There are
alternative models so why are you not exploring these?
Lynn
> On 17 Jan 2016, at 22:41,
Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>
wrote:
>
> The
current system (reader pays for what they want to read) has
proved workable, sustainable and accessible to date! Anyway,
it isn't about that. It is about the way that open
access is being lobbied for with all sorts of bogus claims
about the public good. Nobody seems to be clear on who
actually benefits from OA or how. As I said, one danger is
that a lot of public research money will now go straight to
publishers, thereby decreasing the amount of taxonomic
research being undertaken. Another danger is that
taxonomists without public funding will no longer be able to
afford to publish. Maybe you don't care ..
>
> Stephen
>
>
--------------------------------------------
> On Mon, 18/1/16, JF Mate <aphodiinaemate at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Subject:
Re: [Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
> To: "Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> Received: Monday, 18 January, 2016, 11:06
AM
>
> Stephen,
please explain
> your plan/idea for a
workable, sustainble and
> accessible
journal ecosystem. This is not a
> trap,
I just want to know
> where the last
60+
> mails are leading to (a suspect
nowhere...).
>
> good
night
>
> Jason
>
_______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Celebrating 29 years
of Taxacom in 2016.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 29 years of
Taxacom in 2016.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list