[Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit

[John Grehan]

Stephen, your argument seems similar to the argument against free public
access to national forests and National Parks in NZ - that since most of
the public do not make use of them they should not be paying for their
management for the benefit of the minority that do use them.

John Grehan

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Stephen Thorpe <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
> wrote:

> But Geoff, you are a taxonomist and therefore not a member of the public
> (in the relevant sense). The public should not have to pay so that you just
> might find something interesting in articles that aren't directly relevant
> to your work (or at least they should be given the informed choice of
> whether or not to pay). Don't think about it just from your perspective.
> Think instead of how much demand their really is for many taxonomic papers,
> stacked against the cost of making all of them freely available to
> everybody. There is a difference between "hiding information away" versus
> using public money to make it available to everyone, when only a handful of
> specialists are remotely interested in reading it.
>
> Stephen
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Fri, 15/1/16, Geoff Read <gread at actrix.gen.nz> wrote:
>
>  Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
>  To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>  Received: Friday, 15 January, 2016, 5:17 PM
>
>  Stephen,
>
>  You say " absolutely no point in paying publishers up front
>  to make the
>  publications available freely to everybody in the world"
>
>  The idea that we should restrict access, hide away
>  information from the
>  public, and make it difficult to read our works is abhorrent
>  to me.
>  Fortunately we've come a long way in my lifetime towards
>  open exchange and
>  discussion - the internet as the shining example, and
>  special mention to
>  the access via BHL which has revolutionized our work as
>  taxonomists more
>  recently.
>
>  Every paper published in Zootaxa today was paywalled. I
>  don't have a
>  subscription, so I don't have the access to Zootaxa that I
>  know you do,
>  but I'm interested in dipping into a wide range of taxonomy
>  when I see
>  something on the spot that just might be worth reading but
>  is outside my
>  narrow specialty. It helps me with my own work and it's good
>  to see other
>  ways of doing things, interpretations of the code, and the
>  new techniques
>  used. To do that today I need to write ten begging letters,
>  and wait. Or
>  pay 140 dollars ($14 per paper).  So I'll look at none
>  of them.
>
>  Yesterday was short paper day at Zootaxa - every one of
>  those six was
>  paywalled (including one from a colleague at Elena's
>  institute), but could
>  have so easily have been open access and read much more
>  widely for just
>  lunch money for most of the authors, or around a taxi fare
>  if their
>  employer pays. Hence my amazement that people would not do
>  that when they
>  had the chance.
>
>  Geoff
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu]
>  On Behalf Of
>  Stephen Thorpe
>  Sent: Friday, 15 January 2016 2:46 p.m.
>  To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu;
>  Elena Kupriyanova
>  <Elena.Kupriyanova at austmus.gov.au>
>  Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
>
>  Dear Elena,
>
>  I like your post because I am trying to get people to think
>  this matter
>  through, and your post shows that you are starting to do
>  just that. There
>  appears to be a significant group who are lobbying for open
>  access, even
>  though, as you correctly point out, it is usually not very
>  hard to get
>  hold of publications for free, even when they are not open
>  access. What
>  matters is that the people who need to read the publications
>  can read
>  them. There is absolutely no point in paying publishers up
>  front to make
>  the punlications available freely to everybody in the world,
>  given that
>  only a few people will ever need to read most of them!
>  Somthing very dodgy
>  is going on here - those who stand to gain financially from
>  open access
>  are lobbying hard in favour of it! No surprises there,
>  really ...
>
>  Stephen
>
>  --------------------------------------------
>  On Fri, 15/1/16, Elena Kupriyanova <Elena.Kupriyanova at austmus.gov.au>
>  wrote:
>
>   Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paywall our taxonomic tidbit
>   To: "taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu"
>  <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
>   Received: Friday, 15 January, 2016, 1:07 PM
>
>   Dear colleagues,
>
>   I am really confused by now re what the point of this
>   discussion is. Should we make our taxonomic papers open
>   access or should we use our grant money to do so instead
>  of
>   paying for it out our own pockets? I honestly cannot see
>  any
>   paywall - whenever I need a paper, I just write to the
>   author and ask for a pdf. I am happy to send my own papers
>   to anybody who cares to read them (gosh, where is a chance
>   they might even cite me ;) Besides, there is
>   Researchgate...
>   Best,
>   Lena
>
>   Dr. Elena Kupriyanova
>   Senior Research Scientist
>   Marine Invertebrates
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Taxacom Mailing List
>  Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>  http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>  The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
>  Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.
>