[Taxacom] Homo sapiens

[Francisco Welter-Schultes]

Gary, this is your personal taxonomic interpretation of the 
classification of this individual specimen, or what you personally 
speculate how Linnaeus might personally have classified certain 
individual specimens.
In Art. 72.4.1 the type must be "expressly" excluded from the type 
series, which refers to the type specimen as such, which would require a 
neutral and objective term having been used for the specimen (candidate 
terms are listed in Art. 72.4.6). Linnaeus (1758: 20-24) did not mention 
a type specimen.
So from this point of view the lectotype designation by Stearn 1959: 4 
should stand.

Francisco

Am 14.01.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Rosenberg,Gary:
> Although the information is on the ICZN website, it isn't correct. Under Article 72.4.1, Linnaeus is not eligible to be the lectotype of Homo sapiens; he must be considered excluded from the type series as part of the named variant Homo sapiens europaeus.
>
>
>
> Gary Rosenberg
>
> Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia
>
> Drexel University
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Reuscher
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:54 AM
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Homo sapiens
>
>
>
> The type specimen (lectotype) of Homo sapiens is Linnaeus himself. This designation has not much (if any) practical value, but is more of an honorary status for the "father of binomial nomenclature". The remains of Linnaeus still exist, but, for obvious reasons, they are not available for examinations.
>
> More details can be found on the website of the ICZN:
>
> http://iczn.org/content/who-type-homo-sapiens
>
>
>
> best,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
>
> *Michael Reuscher, **Ph.D.*
>
>
>
> *Postdoctoral Research Associate*
>
>
>
> *Ecosystem Studies & Modeling *
>
>
>
> *Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies*
>
>
>
> *Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi*
>
>
>
> *6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5869*
>
>
>
> *Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5869*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Thomas McCabe <tmccabe at suchwhat.com<mailto:tmccabe at suchwhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>> I am an outside observer (medical) of biological taxonomy. I am
>> interested in the taxonomy of our species, but have been unable to
>> find a formal definition for *Homo sapiens* more recent than the one
>> in Linnaeus’ last edition of *Systema natura*, as modified by Gmelin
>> and translated by Kerr (
>> *http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.57940*
>> <http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.57940>). More recent publications
>> of primate taxonomy in English available to me refer to Linneaus’ definition.
>> Can anyone direct me to a more recent formal revision?
>> Thomas McCabe, MD. tmccabe at suchwhat.com<mailto:tmccabe at suchwhat.com>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu<mailto:Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
>> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>> Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu<mailto:Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
>
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
>
>
> Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Celebrating 29 years of Taxacom in 2016.