[Taxacom] resend Kingdom Protista (and Subkingdom Chromista)
JF Mate
aphodiinaemate at gmail.com
Fri Oct 30 06:52:28 CDT 2015
As long as the topic is taxonomic, the posts civilized and not
spamming, I don“t see any problem.
Jason
On 29 October 2015 at 17:45, Michael A. Ivie <mivie at montana.edu> wrote:
> Ken Kinman repeatedly references his own classification, called the Kinman
> System, and posts modifications of it. Does anyone actually use this? In
> Web of Science, I find a 1994 reference, and a single citation of it in 20
> years. Am I missing something?
>
> Mike
>
> On 10/28/2015 8:46 PM, Kenneth Kinman wrote:
>>
>> Hotmail or Taxacom continues to make a mess posting my classifications, so
>> I'll try just one more time. This is my final attempt. Hi All,
>> Below I decided to show Kingdom Protista divided into Subkingdoms Protozoa
>> and Chromista. I could also combine Phylum Chlorophyta and Kingdom Metaphyta
>> into a Kingdom Viridiplantae if that consensus would be preferable (but that
>> is a separate issue to be decided later). I am all for a consensus
>> classification, but I just don't think Ruggiero et al. was quite enough of a
>> consensus for the protists (and the Kingdoms that evolved from them).
>> ---------------Ken P.S. It should be noted that the current version of
>> Chromista has become much broader than when Chromista was first proposed
>> decades ago. So much so that I am somewhat reluctant to still call this
>> Subkingdom Chromista (especially with the recent addition of Rhizaria).
>> However, in view of Ruggiero et al.'s continued recognition of a full
>> Kingdom Chromista, they left me with little choice if a true consensus is to
>> be achieved. Anyway, just as there are probably better ways to subdivide
>> Superkingdom Prokaryota (into Negibacteria and Posibacteria, rather than
>> Eubacteria and Archaebacteria), there are also probably better ways to
>> subdivide Kingdom Protista. In each case, I guess I'll just have to try to
>> modify the consensus in two steps instead of one. Hopefully I'll live long
>> enough to see that happen. -----------------Ken Kinman
>> KINGDOM PROTISTA SUBKINGDOM PROTOZOA% 1 Euglenozoa 2A Percolozoa B
>> Loukozoa C Metamonada 3A Amoebozoa B Breviatea C Apusozoa D
>> Choanozoa%% 1A Cristidiscoidea 1B {{Fungi}}
>> 2 Ichthyosporea ? Corallochytrea 3 Filasterea
>> 4 Choanoflagellatea 5 {{Animalia}} _a_ {{Kingdom FUNGI a.k.a.
>> EUMYCOTA}} (true fungi) _b_ {{Kingdom ANIMALIA, a.k.a. METAZOA}} 4A
>> Glaucophyta B Rhodophyta C Chlorophyta% _a_ {{Kingdom METAPHYTA, a.k.a
>> PLANTAE sensu stricto}} (embryophytes) 5 {{Subkingdom Chromista}}
>> SUBKINGDOM CHROMISTA 1A Cryptophyta 1B Haptophyta 2 Rhizaria 3
>> Heterokonta (stramenopiles) 4 Ciliophora 5 Dinozoa (or Dinophyta) 6
>> Sporozoa
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
>> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>
>> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________
>
> Michael A. Ivie, Ph.D., F.R.E.S.
>
> US Post Office Address:
> Montana Entomology Collection
> Marsh Labs, Room 50
> 1911 West Lincoln Street
> Montana State University
> Bozeman, MT 59717
> USA
>
> UPS, FedEx, DHL Address:
> Montana Entomology Collection
> Marsh Labs, Room 50
> 1911 West Lincoln Street
> Montana State University
> Bozeman, MT 59718
> USA
>
>
> (406) 994-4610 (voice)
> (406) 994-6029 (FAX)
> mivie at montana.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list