[Taxacom] Fwd: Nature needs names: 60 new dragonflies from Africa
Doug Yanega
dyanega at ucr.edu
Fri Dec 11 18:28:24 CST 2015
As rarely as I may agree with Stephen, in this case he and I perceive
the same problem, though I think it might be better explained, and put
into perspective.
Consider the logical extreme:
How many papers are published globally every month describing new
species of insects alone? Maybe 100, at least, I'd wager. Well, that's
at least 3 papers on new insects *every single day of the year*.
Now, imagine if the mainstream media outlets got three press releases on
new insects handed to them every single day and were asked to give them
all equal air time; how long would it take before they would start
refusing to distribute ANY of them? It really would *not* take very long
before people got utterly, and irrevocably, sick and tired of hearing
about new insect species. As long as a "new insect" press release is a
rare event, that risk is minimal, but if we did it every time a new
insect paper came out, it'd quickly lose all sense of novelty, and we
would not only bore the "non-enthusiast" audience, but the outlets to
reach that audience would also slam shut in our faces.
That being said, please do note that I'm explicitly referring to
mainstream media and press releases. *In a different context entirely*,
I think it would be wonderful to have a visible public place, like a
twitter feed with some catchy title like #newspecies, where people DID
actually post every single paper published anywhere, to impress upon
folks just how much is still being discovered. In the former context,
you're effectively trying to shove your discoveries into people's faces,
and using loads of hype in the process; in the latter context, only
people actively subscribing to that twitter feed will see the constant
bombardment (it's "opt-in"), and what they'd be getting *from* that feed
is basically hype-free links to the papers (you can't fit a lot of hype
into 140 characters!). Having a feed that posts every paper, from all
sources, for all taxa from fungi to dinosaurs to insects, would also
help level the proverbial playing field, rather than giving exposure
only to those researchers/institutions with the resources or inclination
to produce and promote press releases. We really do NOT want taxonomy to
become any more of a "popularity contest" than it already is.
Sincerely,
--
Doug Yanega Dept. of Entomology Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314 skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
http://cache.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html
"There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list