[Taxacom] Biodiversity questions: Classifications

Fred Schueler bckcdb at istar.ca
Thu Oct 3 11:08:33 CDT 2013


On 10/3/2013 11:54 AM, John Grehan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:51 AM, John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com
> <mailto:calabar.john at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>  But we do not have published ages, only published miminal ages.

* but the minimal age of an ancestoral divergence is a maximum age for 
the divergence of descendents.

Categories are a hierarchical sequence, and since time is linear, it's a 
lot less ambiguous than "expert opinion" as a tie-down for the 
hierarchy. The much more complex alternative would be to measure the 
pheneticists' "overall morphological similarity" as a surrogate for 
ecological divergence, and assign levels of phenetic difference to each 
category.

fred.
========================================================


>
>     John grehan
>
>
>     On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Fred Schueler <bckcdb at istar.ca
>     <mailto:bckcdb at istar.ca>> wrote:
>
>         On 10/3/2013 11:20 AM, John Grehan wrote:
>          > Trouble is that there is no standard objective method for
>         assigning age
>          > since all age estimates are minimal. Some have made some esoteric
>          > mathematical arguments for having confidence in a particular
>         age or
>          > range, but its still an argument. Some groups may have some
>         level of
>          > "consensus" or majority opinion, but its still just an
>         opinion. As yet
>          > there is no unambiguous criterion for determining precise age.
>
>         * sure - it's an hypothesis. As Bunge says "we know that all our
>         constructions are defective, hence corrigible." Ages associated
>         with a
>         name both give the general user an idea of at least roughly how
>         old a
>         group is thought to be, and would challenge specialists to
>         improve the
>         resolution of their estimates.
>
>         We now have enough published ages of groups that we can guess in the
>         ages of descendent groups, and challenge paleontology,
>         biogeography, and
>         genetic comparisons to improve the accuracy of these guesses.
>         We've been
>         guessing about distributions on the basis of collected specimens for
>         centuries, and this is the same procedure extended from spatial to
>         temporal estimates.
>
>         fred.
>         =================================================
>          > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Fred Schueler
>         <bckcdb at istar.ca <mailto:bckcdb at istar.ca>
>          > <mailto:bckcdb at istar.ca <mailto:bckcdb at istar.ca>>> wrote:
>          >
>          >     On 10/3/2013 6:59 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
>          >      > There is NO scientific information to be derived from
>         higher
>          >     classifications
>          >      > as there are NO scientific principles / standards
>         underlying our
>          >     current
>          >      > classifications.
>          >      >
>          >      > Willi Hennig years ago tried to suggest a standard (age of
>          >     origin) on which
>          >      > to base rank within a classification. BUT he was
>         ignored by all.
>          >
>          >     * others who have made the suggestion independently have
>         also been
>          >     ignored. If an age is associated with each category, then
>         the use of the
>          >     category for a monophyletic group becomes a falsifiable
>         hypothesis, and
>          >     rescues the notion of category from the stigma of
>         Aristotelian
>          >     arbitrariness.
>          >
>          >     I wonder, if this isn't to be done in an immediate
>         convulsion, if the
>          >     proposed age of the group could be appended, along with
>         the author's
>          >     name - e.g. class Mammalia (L; early Permian) - until
>         consensus emerges
>          >     on the ages of categories in each higher taxon, perhaps
>         grading into a
>          >     system where age alone is the categorical marker.
>          >
>          >     fred.
>          >     ------------------------------------------------------------
>          >                Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
>          >     Bishops Mills Natural History Centre -
>         http://pinicola.ca/bmnhc.htm
>          >     Mudpuppy Night in Oxford Mills -
>         http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm
>          >     Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
>          >                RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
>          >         on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
>          > (613)258-3107 <tel:%28613%29258-3107> <tel:%28613%29258-3107>
>         <bckcdb at istar.ca <http://istar.ca>
>          >     <http://istar.ca>> http://pinicola.ca/
>          >     ------------------------------------------------------------
>          >
>          >     _______________________________________________
>          >     Taxacom Mailing List
>          > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>         <mailto:Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
>         <mailto:Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>         <mailto:Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>>
>          > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>          >
>          >     The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with
>         either of
>          >     these methods:
>          >
>          >     (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>          >
>          >     (2) a Google search specified as:
>          >       site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
>         <http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom>
>          >     <http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom>  your
>         search terms here
>          >
>          >     Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
>          >
>          >
>
>
>         --
>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>                    Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
>         Bishops Mills Natural History Centre - http://pinicola.ca/bmnhc.htm
>         Mudpuppy Night in Oxford Mills - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm
>         Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
>                    RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
>             on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
>         (613)258-3107 <tel:%28613%29258-3107> <bckcdb at istar.ca
>         <http://istar.ca>> http://pinicola.ca/
>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Taxacom Mailing List
>         Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu <mailto:Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
>         http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
>         The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of
>         these methods:
>
>         (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
>         (2) a Google search specified as:
>           site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
>         <http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom>  your search terms
>         here
>
>         Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
>
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
          Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Bishops Mills Natural History Centre - http://pinicola.ca/bmnhc.htm
Mudpuppy Night in Oxford Mills - http://pinicola.ca/mudpup1.htm
Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
          RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
   on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
    (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the Taxacom mailing list