[Taxacom] double-peaked mountains

[Stephen Thorpe]

Mine does likewise, because you write knowing that that your meaning will not be understood!
 
I was glossing over problems with defining the individual, as they aren't relevant to my main point, but, to be pedantic, all we ever actually see are parts of individuals
 
Stephen


________________________________
From: Curtis Clark <lists at curtisclark.org>
To: "taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> 
Sent: Saturday, 30 November 2013 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] double-peaked mountains


On 2013-11-29 7:45 PM, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> Likewise! I am stricken with the truth, and you are stricken with 
> ignorance!! :)

My sympathy only deepens, especially because you rushed to judgment 
without knowing what I meant.

Pray tell, in the case of Pando, can you see the individual for the trees?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_%28tree%29 


-- 
Curtis Clark        http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
Biological Sciences                  +1 909 869 4140
Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona CA 91768


_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org/

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.