[Taxacom] when is a common species critically endangered?

[Geoff Read]

Let us bear in mind that no one, other than Stephen, knows what document
he is talking about, or the exact treatment given to his examples.

If there are some odd assessments in amongst the appropriate ones in what
he's seen well that's unfortunate and should be corrected.  From what I
know of the process as done in the past (for NZ marine organisms) it's
been quite rigorous with wide consultation with the experts, and by no
means mindless pasting.

Geoff



On Tue, July 3, 2012 1:09 am, JF Mate wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
>
> You can´t demonstrate anything from 6 specimens really, so I have to
> agree, it seems overzealousness bordering on ignorance on whoever is
> compiling the list. They make the mite look like a Panda bear! The
> roblem, and this is the crux of the matter, is that these lists are
> supposed to be a gold standard, but they seem to be assembled by
> copy-paste aggregators. The nematode and the moth have no standing in
> the list other than data deficient, like the vast majority of
> invertebrates and the mite vulnerable (to human whim). How many
> amateur entomologists are there in NZ? Is it a dying hobby like in the
> Northern Hemisphere? That may explain the lack of information for the
> moth.