[Taxacom] Fwd: Woodpeckers, primates, as well as the Wallace Line gauntlet
John Grehan
jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
Wed May 25 13:34:37 CDT 2011
-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Jason Mate
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:27 PM
John,
> there are two ways, dispersal or vicariance. You can´t have 3rd way of
> "vicariance but unsupported", or is that your null?
If you want to do that then ok.
> If your data doesn´t support vicariance you know which box you can tick.
If - but a lot of the time its not about whether the data support one thing or not, but the assumptions that are read into the data.
>Saying "Using chance dispersal as an imagined explanation leads nowhere as
> it fails to predict biogeographic patterns or geological correlations" is
> nonsensical.
No it is not.
> Do you honestly believe that history is that clean?
Clean as what?
> That it is a beautiful story played along tectonic blocks just for our
> delight?
????
> Who forgot to tell the Hawaiian terrestrial biota?
Tell the biota what?
John Grehan
> Have a good one.
Thanks,
John Grehan
Jason
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:31:25 -0400
> From: jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Fwd: Woodpeckers, primates, as well as the Wallace Line gauntlet
>
> Jason,
>
> You are correct that the panbiogeographic method assumes neither
> vicariance nor dispersal. But the result of the global analyses is that
> track patterns do not support means of dispersal (theorized
> dispersability) from imagined centers of origin as the key to the origin
> of distribution and differentiation.
>
> Using chance dispersal as an imagined explanation leads nowhere as it
> fails to predict biogeographic patterns or geological correlations.
> Whether this is 'open minded' or not one can decide for one's self - if
> it matters to anyone. I wonder if its more open minded than the reaction
> one gets periodically that the successes of panbiogeography in making
> tectonic correlations or geological predictions was just meaningless
> blind luck. Only in evolutionary theory does this philosophy of science
> seem to be acceptable.
>
> It is an irony that molecular papers over the last decade have focused
> more and more on presenting maps of distribution for their taxa,
> something that was often lacking or poorly presented in many (but not
> all) morphologically based studies.
>
> John Grehan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Jason Mate
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 5:25 PM
> To: Taxacom
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Fwd: Woodpeckers, primates, as well as the
> Wallace Line gauntlet
>
>
>
> >
> > As usual, I'm in complete agreement with everything you've written.
> Using chance (dispersal) to explain a pattern is just nihilism and leads
> nowhere. On the positive side, have a look at the Mol. Phylogen. Evol.
> website. 13 of the 46 forthcoming papers (28%) have chosen to put maps
> in their graphic abstracts - their most interesting result was a
> geographic pattern! At the rate these patterns are now accumulating, I
> can't see the concept of chance dispersal lasting much longer. Once it's
> dropped, a real science of biogeography may develop.
>
> Yup, Panbiogeography is an open-minded endeavour indeed where neither
> vicariance nor dispersal is assumed. Or am I misreading? ;)
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list