[Taxacom] EJT, European journal for taxonomy : call for papers

[Paul Kirk]

Is not the simple solution here (and for botanical nomenclature) to return to the original (?) meaning of publication - to make public. If a name is made public it satisfies that part of the Code w.r.t. publication; assuming other parts of the publication are Code compliant, the name is available(zool.)/valid(botan.). Right?

A previous comment suggested that taxonomy has a means of dealing with names which are the result of bad taxonomy - it's synonymy - and in a digital era this can happen very very fast. The half-life of nomenclaturally superfluous names is falling ... if this was a metric it might be useful as a 'moderating' mechanism. Not too good on your CV if your 'new' name has a half-life of 69 milli seconds?

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of dipteryx at freeler.nl
Sent: 30 June 2011 08:26
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] EJT, European journal for taxonomy : call for papers

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu namens Doug Yanega
Verzonden: wo 29-6-2011 18:50

>> Quoting from the website (third paragraph):
>>
>>    "Printed versions of EJT papers will be distributed to some
>>     major natural history museums and institutions to comply
>>     with the rules of the different nomenclatural codes."

> It is remarkable how many people seem to think that the Zoological
> Code contains a requirement that paper copies be deposited in a
> library.

***
It is not possible to deduce from the quote if these 'publications'
will be Code compliant (or not), all it says that the intent is to comply with the rules of the relevant Code. So it is much too early to start criticizing.

As to the wording of the zoological Code, the "COULD have printed one copy one day, two copies the next day, another copy three days later (with a typo fixed), two more copies the following day, and so forth,"  is only non-compliant because of the fixing of the typo. The requirement is for the work to be simultaneously obtainable, not simultaneously produced. A method that produces five copies a day, for a week and a half (with a rest over the weekend) can be Code-compliant, provided the copies are made public (published) simultaneously. What you cannot do is put them in the mail or sell them off as they are produced, piecemeal.

As to the fixing of the typo this could also occur when printing them in a single day, or when using a printing press. So these are two separate issues.

Of course, this is not to say that the procedure that EJT announces to be pursuing is an example to be followed (it does sound like a grey area), but there is no reason to assume anything will actually go wrong.

Paul

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it is confidential and is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is prohibited.

Whilst CAB International trading as CABI takes steps to prevent the transmission of viruses via e-mail, we cannot guarantee that any e-mail or attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly advised to undertake your own anti-virus precautions.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at cabi at cabi.org or by telephone on +44 (0)1491 829199 and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it.

CABI is an International Organization recognised by the UK Government under Statutory Instrument 1982 No. 1071.

**************************************************************************