[Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the forthcomingInternational Botanical Congress

Stephen Thorpe stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Wed Jul 6 20:51:07 CDT 2011


so, you effectively want to use the same name for a different taxonomic genus 
(so as to avoid 1998 changes in combination), and you think that doing so won't 
cause confusion???




________________________________
From: "Thiele, Kevin" <Kevin.Thiele at dec.wa.gov.au>
To: John Grehan <jgrehan at sciencebuff.org>; "taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu" 
<taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Thu, 7 July, 2011 11:32:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the forthcomingInternational 
Botanical Congress

John,

please consider this scenario. A hypothetical genus of 2000 species needs to be 
split into two (for whatever reason). One segregate comprises 2 species and 
occurs only in Australia. The second segregate comprises 1998 species, occurs 
worldwide and contains species that very well-known, are important in 
horticulture, industry etc, and are ecologically important and hence widely used 
in the literature. The type is one of the two Australian species.

Are you seriously suggesting that the Code should not have provision for dealing 
with scenarios such as this?

[Note to stave off criticism: I'm not suggesting that this is the Acacia 
scenario - my genus here is purely hypothetical to deal with John's point]

Cheers - Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu 
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Grehan
Sent: Thursday, 7 July 2011 6:45 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the forthcomingInternational 
Botanical Congress

In other words if not enough Africans use the services of those who have
the power to make the change then too bad.

Nothing more stable than keeping a type name with a type.

John Grehan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kirk [mailto:p.kirk at cabi.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 4:54 PM
To: John Grehan; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the
forthcomingInternational Botanical Congress

This is NOT for the convenience of taxonomists, african or otherwise ...
it's for the convenience of the users of the services taxonomist provide
- paramount of which is a stable method of naming taxonomic groups.

Paul
________________________________________
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] on behalf of John Grehan
[jgrehan at sciencebuff.org]
Sent: 06 July 2011 18:20
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Call for proxy votes for the forthcoming
International Botanical Congress

Fred R. Barrie, Secretary

-----  Botanical nomenclature has always been governed in a democratic
fashion.
General Committee for Botanical Nomenclature

Even democracy can be abused. If I am correct that the current Type is
for an African taxon, then one might ask how many botanical
nomenclaturists are in Africa vs in Australia-South America. Perhaps I
am wrong, but it might seem as if non-Africans are making a grab for
what is currently an African type to suit their (non-African)
convenience, never might the convenience of African taxonomists.

John Grehan

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with
it is confidential and is for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient please note that any
distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in
it is prohibited.

Whilst CAB International trading as CABI takes steps to prevent the
transmission of viruses via e-mail, we cannot guarantee that any e-mail
or attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly advised
to undertake your own anti-virus precautions.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by
e-mail at cabi at cabi.org or by telephone on +44 (0)1491 829199 and then
delete the e-mail and any copies of it.

CABI is an International Organization recognised by the UK Government
under Statutory Instrument 1982 No. 1071.

************************************************************************
**




_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these 
methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  
your search terms here
This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the
addressee only. It may contain confidential or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify
the sender, delete the email and attachments from your system and
destroy any copies you may have taken of the email and its attachments.
Duplication or further distribution by hardcopy, by electronic means
or verbally is not permitted without permission.


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these 
methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  
your search terms here



More information about the Taxacom mailing list