[Taxacom] New molecular propaganda on primate systematics

[Kim van der Linde]

John,

I am not yet sure where your problem is, and so I have a question. How 
do you suggest that we resolve the issue of morphological versus 
molecular data when the data is inconsistent with each other? I have a 
similar issue in Drosophila and in the parrot family.

Kim

On 4/26/2011 8:33 PM, John Grehan wrote:
> Sergio,
>
> Perhaps you (and also Kim van der Linde) would care to identify what you thought was robust about it and I could then give a précis of the problems/limitations as Jeff and I saw them that will be presented in our (hopefully) to be published response.
>
> John Grehan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergio Vargas [mailto:sevragorgia at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:09 PM
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu; John Grehan
> Subject: New molecular propaganda on primate systematics
>
>    Hi,
>
> just read the reply to the orangutan paper, looks robust... I would like to see your reply! could you please let us know when it gets published.
>
> sergio
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
>

-- 
http://www.kimvdlinde.com