[Taxacom] Why Taxonomy does NOT matter

[Haas, Fabian]

Hi Fred,

well I am sure reasons and statements do exists. If there are none, that would be an interesting result too!

in any case I am looking forward to read more experiences and learn mor through this mailing list

Best

Fabian


________________________________________
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Frederick W. Schueler [bckcdb at istar.ca]
Sent: 18 April 2011 17:40
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Why Taxonomy does NOT matter

On 4/18/2011 9:36 AM, Kim van der Linde wrote:
> Let's play advocate of the devil.

* to repeat the call in my recent post: what Fabian is asking for is
*specimens* of actual arguments made by those in a position to influence
the underfunding of taxonomy/systematics.

Maybe these don't exist, and the underfunding of taxonomy is either an
unspoken conspiracy or an accident? I'm intrigued by the absence of a
flood of "My adminstrator told me taxonomy doesn't deserve funding
because..." stories.

fred.
===================================================


>
> Taxonomy is completely irrelevant. Why? Well, ultimately, all that
> counts in most contexts is our ability to determine boundaries between
> groups of interbreeding individuals. What name they have, ultimately, is
> irrelevant, a standardized English name would do equally well because
> the species can still be identified, conserved and talked about. This
> phenomenon is already observed in cases where taxonomists change names
> of species that are completely ignored by the community at large (for
> example Aedes aegypti) and in groups that have experienced frequent name
> changes to the point that the researchers of those species use only the
> common name of the species to find articles (for example Zebrafish). The
> idea that we need names of higher taxa for comparative analyzes is
> bogus, because as long as we have sequences of the individuals we work
> with, we can create a distance matrix and map changes in character
> states across them and determine how they have changed. In short, we can
> eliminate the whole field of taxonomy without much trouble for the rest
> of biology.
>

--

------------------------------------------------------------
          Frederick W. Schueler & Aleta Karstad
Bishops Mills Natural History Centre - http://pinicola.ca/bmnhc.htm
now in the field on the Thirty Years Later Expedition -
http://fragileinheritance.org/projects/thirty/thirtyintro.htm
Daily Paintings - http://karstaddailypaintings.blogspot.com/
     RR#2 Bishops Mills, Ontario, Canada K0G 1T0
   on the Smiths Falls Limestone Plain 44* 52'N 75* 42'W
    (613)258-3107 <bckcdb at istar.ca> http://pinicola.ca/
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here