[Taxacom] Re; Inappropriate accuracy of locality data

[Richard Pyle]

Thanks to Arthur for the reply.  It all sounds very good!

Bob wrote:

> I guess when you refer to 'standard' you mean 'for use in museum
> databases, GBIF-style aggregations, etc'.

Yes -- that's exactly what I meant.

> So how do we get locality data from publications like these into more
widely
> usable form? I'm thinking here of *current*, not legacy publications.

Very good question!  I'm wrestling with the same issues in the context of
taxon names and concepts.

Aloha,
Rich