[Taxacom] FW: ICZN procedure question

[fautin at ku.edu]

A major difference, as most of you well know, with the bacterio-taxonomic 
world is that registration is required.  A new taxon either must be 
described in the one master journal or publication of it elsewhere must be 
announced in that journal.  Yes, it might be because they started anew in 
1980 and it might be because they have fewer taxa.  But a major difference 
-- one that has been proposed for zoology but is loudly rejected for many 
reasons -- is the single-journal pass point.  This makes tracking all 
names easy -- and it allowed the bacteriologists to go electronic without 
some of the objections zoologists are hearing.


Daphne G. Fautin
Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Curator, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center
Haworth Hall
University of Kansas
1200 Sunnyside Avenue
Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7534  USA

telephone 1-785-864-3062
fax 1-785-864-5321
evo user name fautin
website www.nhm.ku.edu/~inverts

       direct to database of hexacorals, including sea anemones
               newest version released 1 December 2009
         ***http://hercules.kgs.ku.edu/Hexacoral/Anemone2***


On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Richard Pyle wrote:

>
> Indeed!
>
> As was pointed out to me off-list, the bacteriological Code has already
> accomodated e-only publications since 2005.  So really we're talking about
> botanical and zoological communities playing catch-up.
>
> But, of course, our communities are somewhat larger and more heterogenous,
> and we have a much longer legacy of historical names to deal with (unless,
> like the bacteriologists, we're comfortable with establishing a definitive
> list of available names and abandaoning all previous names not on the list
> -- which I don't think we'll be ready for anytime soon).
>
> But in any case, I think Michael's point is, the reality is increasingly
> clear, and we can either ignore that, or find ways to deal with it as best
> we can, keeping in mind not just our needs, but the needs of the generaitons
> to follow. Indeed, the issues about long-term archiving are for them, not
> us.
>
> Aloha,
> Rich
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of
>> Michael A. Ivie
>> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:40 AM
>> To: Frank.Krell at dmns.org
>> Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] FW: ICZN procedure question
>>
>> OK, it is time for a reality check. I like paper, I like
>> books. BUT, paper is GOING TO GO AWAY.  Can't change that.
>> Scientific names are going to be used, and they will
>> eventually be based on works without paper  REALITY.
>>
>> Our choice it to either manage this transition so that there
>> are some controls on the process, or lose control completely,
>> because the use of names is going to happen either within the
>> Code or the Code will be come an arcane and ignored document.
>>
>> Drop the idea of stopping change, get used to the idea that
>> even today paper publications are "the living dead," and come
>> up with a reasonable and useful way to manage what is coming.
>> It does not matter that a majority of the CURRENT taxonomic
>> community (including me) does not like this, it maters that
>> we lead in such a way that the FUTURE taxonomic community
>> considers our actions useful enough to use.
>>
>> Michael Ivie